Skip to main content
The Workplace

Return to Answer

edited body
Source Link
HLGEM
HLGEM
  • 142.4k
  • 26
  • 262
  • 516

The likeliest scenario is that you will have to pay back the time. For instance suppose you get 10 days a year and you took 5 as most companies let you take the leave in advance of earning it especially if they do not allow you to carry over any leave to the next year. But you really earn this incrementally with every pay check. So if you have worked less than half a year, you are in a negative balance and you will have to pay back the money in your last paycheck. In this case it is usually better to stay at least long enough that you are not in a negative balance.

To check your company's policies, read through the HR handbook you were given when you were hired. It is important to always read this and understand what policies they have surrounding things like leave so that you can make informed choices.

Quitting after three months in a job early in your career is not career limiting, but it is if you do it repeatedly. So take the time to find a job that will suit you better where you wullwill be able to stay. Although frankly nothing you have said sounds unusual in the workplace for an entry-level person, so personally I would stick it out and see if it gets better. The grass is not always greener, you could end up someplace much worse. These people have been very accommodating with your personal problems and many workplaces would not have been. Really 3 months is far too little time to really get going in an entry level job.

The likeliest scenario is that you will have to pay back the time. For instance suppose you get 10 days a year and you took 5 as most companies let you take the leave in advance of earning it especially if they do not allow you to carry over any leave to the next year. But you really earn this incrementally with every pay check. So if you have worked less than half a year, you are in a negative balance and you will have to pay back the money in your last paycheck. In this case it is usually better to stay at least long enough that you are not in a negative balance.

To check your company's policies, read through the HR handbook you were given when you were hired. It is important to always read this and understand what policies they have surrounding things like leave so that you can make informed choices.

Quitting after three months in a job early in your career is not career limiting, but it is if you do it repeatedly. So take the time to find a job that will suit you better where you wull be able to stay. Although frankly nothing you have said sounds unusual in the workplace for an entry-level person, so personally I would stick it out and see if it gets better. The grass is not always greener, you could end up someplace much worse. These people have been very accommodating with your personal problems and many workplaces would not have been. Really 3 months is far too little time to really get going in an entry level job.

The likeliest scenario is that you will have to pay back the time. For instance suppose you get 10 days a year and you took 5 as most companies let you take the leave in advance of earning it especially if they do not allow you to carry over any leave to the next year. But you really earn this incrementally with every pay check. So if you have worked less than half a year, you are in a negative balance and you will have to pay back the money in your last paycheck. In this case it is usually better to stay at least long enough that you are not in a negative balance.

To check your company's policies, read through the HR handbook you were given when you were hired. It is important to always read this and understand what policies they have surrounding things like leave so that you can make informed choices.

Quitting after three months in a job early in your career is not career limiting, but it is if you do it repeatedly. So take the time to find a job that will suit you better where you will be able to stay. Although frankly nothing you have said sounds unusual in the workplace for an entry-level person, so personally I would stick it out and see if it gets better. The grass is not always greener, you could end up someplace much worse. These people have been very accommodating with your personal problems and many workplaces would not have been. Really 3 months is far too little time to really get going in an entry level job.

Source Link
HLGEM
HLGEM
  • 142.4k
  • 26
  • 262
  • 516

The likeliest scenario is that you will have to pay back the time. For instance suppose you get 10 days a year and you took 5 as most companies let you take the leave in advance of earning it especially if they do not allow you to carry over any leave to the next year. But you really earn this incrementally with every pay check. So if you have worked less than half a year, you are in a negative balance and you will have to pay back the money in your last paycheck. In this case it is usually better to stay at least long enough that you are not in a negative balance.

To check your company's policies, read through the HR handbook you were given when you were hired. It is important to always read this and understand what policies they have surrounding things like leave so that you can make informed choices.

Quitting after three months in a job early in your career is not career limiting, but it is if you do it repeatedly. So take the time to find a job that will suit you better where you wull be able to stay. Although frankly nothing you have said sounds unusual in the workplace for an entry-level person, so personally I would stick it out and see if it gets better. The grass is not always greener, you could end up someplace much worse. These people have been very accommodating with your personal problems and many workplaces would not have been. Really 3 months is far too little time to really get going in an entry level job.