Timeline for Continue or “turn the page” and move on?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13 at 8:01 | vote | accept | ayr | ||
| Apr 11 at 23:55 | comment | added | keshlam | It does answer. If you want to pursue it with this group, they have told you what; I am telling you how. | |
| Apr 11 at 21:45 | comment | added | Vector | This might be good advice, but it does not at all answer the question. | |
| Apr 11 at 17:50 | comment | added | ayr | Yes, this is possible. But it is also possible to simply change scientific interests in the process of work, the emergence of new ideas and hypotheses. It seems to me that this is a normal phenomenon in the career of a scientist. | |
| Apr 11 at 17:08 | comment | added | ayr | academia.stackexchange.com/questions/191403/… unpleasant contradiction | |
| Apr 11 at 16:45 | comment | added | keshlam | See discussions elsewhere about "overqualified". Many folks have trouble believing someone is really ready to do a deep reset after intensive specialization in another area. They worry that the work you can do at this s stage isn't worth what you think you should be getting paid and that they'll rapidly lose you if you ever come up short of cash, or that you may lose interest, or ... You may know you're making a serious long-term commitment to the new field, but they may have doubts and want to give the position to someone who they think is a better long-term investment. | |
| Apr 11 at 15:22 | comment | added | ayr | Could you explain the last paragraph "Unfortunately, with a PhD it's unlikely..." in more detail? | |
| Apr 11 at 15:20 | history | edited | keshlam | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 84 characters in body
|
| Apr 11 at 15:03 | history | answered | keshlam | CC BY-SA 4.0 |