Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • Could you explain the last paragraph "Unfortunately, with a PhD it's unlikely..." in more detail?
    – ayr
    Commented Apr 11 at 15:22
  • 1
    See discussions elsewhere about "overqualified". Many folks have trouble believing someone is really ready to do a deep reset after intensive specialization in another area. They worry that the work you can do at this s stage isn't worth what you think you should be getting paid and that they'll rapidly lose you if you ever come up short of cash, or that you may lose interest, or ... You may know you're making a serious long-term commitment to the new field, but they may have doubts and want to give the position to someone who they think is a better long-term investment.
    – keshlam
    Commented Apr 11 at 16:45
  • academia.stackexchange.com/questions/191403/… unpleasant contradiction
    – ayr
    Commented Apr 11 at 17:08
  • Yes, this is possible. But it is also possible to simply change scientific interests in the process of work, the emergence of new ideas and hypotheses. It seems to me that this is a normal phenomenon in the career of a scientist.
    – ayr
    Commented Apr 11 at 17:50
  • 2
    This might be good advice, but it does not at all answer the question.
    – Vector
    Commented Apr 11 at 21:45