Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 15, 2020 at 6:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/1305748200691765248
Sep 14, 2020 at 7:33 comment added Jim @DarcyThomas: You are correct!
Sep 14, 2020 at 7:32 comment added Jim @IanKemp: I thought so but I was under the impression that the retro is more about highlighting collaboration/communication issues not about technical problems
Sep 13, 2020 at 1:23 comment added DarcyThomas @IanKemp In my experience retrospectives generally only identify problems which occured in the last sprint or two (which is important don't get me wrong) but often miss longer term trending problems, which is what I think OP is trying to ask about. E.g., I watched a talk recently where, after writing and fixing millions of lines of code, they discovered the way they were using if statements was causing 90% of their bugs. I think OP wants to learn ways of discovering those kind of bug root causes.
Sep 12, 2020 at 8:02 comment added Gregory Currie I just want to comment that it's far better to learn from other companies mistakes rather than your own. Meaning that, following established best practices is far better than forging your own path and coming to the same conclusions. Not really an answer, but a focus on preventative analysis is likely to be received better than a post-analysis, where people are fearful of the blame game.
Sep 12, 2020 at 6:44 comment added fraxinus Wrong assumption? Because they don't.
Sep 11, 2020 at 21:56 comment added Robbie Goodwin Don't you think that comes down to two separate, largely unanswerable Questions? How do big development teams (anything)? How does anyone learn from mistakes?
Sep 11, 2020 at 17:59 answer added user48276 timeline score: 0
Sep 11, 2020 at 14:29 answer added bethlakshmi timeline score: 1
Sep 11, 2020 at 12:11 comment added Ian Kemp I don't think you understand agile at all - the retrospective meeting at the end of each sprint is intended exactly for this sort of analysis and reflection, with the end result being concrete suggestions for improvement that you integrate into the next sprint. At the end of that sprint, you use its retro to evaluate whether what you did had the desired outcome, and incorporate that feedback into the next sprint - rinse repeat. Agile is not about defining universal processes that work for every company, it is about being quick to react and willing to adapt as relevant for your company.
S Sep 11, 2020 at 6:26 history suggested sixtyfootersdude CC BY-SA 4.0
Fix line breaks
Sep 10, 2020 at 23:59 comment added CynicallyNaive Seems like this question is a much better fit for softwareengineering.stackexchange.com . If you want to generalize into how teams of all types learn from mistakes, OK, fine, but the question seems scoped quite specifically to issues of software development.
Sep 10, 2020 at 20:29 review Suggested edits
S Sep 11, 2020 at 6:26
Sep 10, 2020 at 17:10 answer added Old_Lamplighter timeline score: 2
Sep 10, 2020 at 16:26 answer added Peteris timeline score: 2
Sep 10, 2020 at 15:45 history became hot network question
Sep 10, 2020 at 15:38 answer added mxyzplk timeline score: 39
Sep 10, 2020 at 11:10 answer added user timeline score: 103
Sep 10, 2020 at 9:59 answer added Robin Bennett timeline score: 4
Sep 10, 2020 at 9:11 review Close votes
Sep 16, 2020 at 3:02
Sep 10, 2020 at 8:36 answer added Kilisi timeline score: 2
Sep 10, 2020 at 7:58 answer added berry120 timeline score: 8
Sep 10, 2020 at 7:44 history asked Jim CC BY-SA 4.0