Timeline for Is it reasonable for me to complain about an objectionable newspaper being ordered for the office?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2017 at 19:59 | comment | added | seizethecarp | There's nothing like finding actual evidence and being able to circle it in print to make your point. Alternatively, there's nothing like looking for actual evidence and turning up empty-handed to make you question your opinion. I think this is the best answer because it will allow the OP to step outside of presenting his opinion and feelings and present facts. Or, if as Ben is suggesting, there are no facts, it will help Bob calm down some, too. | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 15:49 | comment | added | Konrad Rudolph | @Acccumulation Read my heated comment discussions with Ben elsewhere and you should see that the opposite is actually the case: I’ve repeatedly said that popularity/mainstreamness is insufficient to determine acceptability in the workplace (and by inference the opposite is the case as well). At any rate, I actually thought yours is a good answer, and upvoted it. | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 15:38 | comment | added | Acccumulation | @KonradRudolph you are simply repeating the argumentum ad populum arguments of the OP. To which I repeat my advice: if the OP can find a racist article, they should file a complaint based on that. If all they have is "reputation", that's not enough. | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 13:23 | comment | added | user44634 | @KonradRudolph that's completely untrue. | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 9:33 | comment | added | Konrad Rudolph | The racist reputation of the Daily Mail is fairly well established in the UK. In fact, contrary to the majority of the answers here, it’s generally considered unfit for the workplace for their racist and sexist contents. | |
| Nov 30, 2017 at 3:02 | history | answered | Acccumulation | CC BY-SA 3.0 |