Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

13
  • 13
    "These are your feelings and you can't be denied them." Feelings are not inherently legitimate or worth considering for everybody else. Yes, we can't deny you have them, but we can certainly deny that they are worth addressing.
    – user15729
    Commented Nov 29, 2017 at 19:07
  • 6
    I disagree. Some feelings are childish and contemptible and should just be dismissed. But this isn't a place for discussion, so I'll leave it at that.
    – user15729
    Commented Nov 29, 2017 at 19:41
  • 5
    @Statsanalyst So it just goes from Page 2 directly to Page 4 now? Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 3:05
  • 3
    @PoloHoleSet I think the problem is simply that the given argument is shoddy. Pete M. talks about "feelings that cannot be denied" and "invalidating a person's feelings". The problem is that racists, bigots, crazies and religious fundamentalists have also feelings (and they are often very strong), so neither the mere presence of feelings nor their intensity has any argumentative value. Worse, e.g. a religious fundamentalist could argue that he finds women at work a toxic environment and demand that this feelings are addressed. fredsbend only pointed that out. Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 15:54
  • 3
    @polo Not the HR manager. The whiney employee complaining about reading material in the break room because she feels it's important.
    – user15729
    Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 16:24