Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • 24
    If you are considering commenting, keep in mind if you don't have anything nice, don't say it at all.
    – enderland
    Commented Nov 28, 2017 at 19:54
  • 18
    If you are considering commenting, also keep in mind that the purpose of comments is to improve the post (e.g. by asking clarifying questions), not to have discussions. Commented Nov 29, 2017 at 16:53
  • 16
    Can you give us an indication of the mix of newspapers provided? Do they cover all shades of political opinion?
    – RoyC
    Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 11:38
  • 4
    "I am angry ... that such disreputable opinions are being read and spread around the office." Is this actually what is happening? Isn't it plausible that your colleagues will just ignore that paper among your office selection, or perhaps pick it up strictly for entertainment and ignore the bad journalism?
    – Brandin
    Commented Dec 1, 2017 at 17:57
  • 4
    The word "objectionable" in the title feels misleading. More accurate might be "controversial."
    – Brandin
    Commented Dec 1, 2017 at 18:02