W3Techs
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Blog Categories

All

News
AddThis
AddToAny
Adobe DTM
AdRoll
Advertising Networks
Akamai
Alibaba
Amazon
Amazon CloudFront
Angular
Apache
ASP.NET
ASP.NET Ajax
Baidu Analytics
Baidu Share
Bitrix
Blogger
Bootstrap
CDNJS
CentOS
Character Encodings
China Telecom
China Unicom
Chitika
Client-side Languages
Cloudflare
Cloudflare Server
ColdFusion
Compression
Concrete CMS
Content Delivery
Content Languages
Content Management
Cookies
CSS Frameworks
Data Centers
DataLife Engine
Debian
Default Protocol Https
DigiCert
DigiCert Group
Discuz!
DNS Servers
Dojo
DoubleClick
Drupal
Elementor
Email Servers
Ensighten
ExoClick
Facebook
Facebook Pixel
Fastly
Fedora
Flash
Full Circle Studies
Gemius
Gentoo
GlobalSign
Gmail
GoDaddy Group
Google
Google +1
Google Ads
Google AdSense
Google Analytics
Google Hosted Libraries
Google Servers
Google Tag Manager
GridPane
Gunicorn
Histats
Hostinger
Hotjar
HTML
HTML5
HTTP/2
HTTP/3
IdenTrust
Image File Formats
Infolinks
IPv6
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript Libraries
Joomla
JQuery
JQuery CDN
JsDelivr
Let’s Encrypt
Liferay
LinkedIn
Linux
LiteSpeed
Magento
Markup Languages
Matomo
Matomo Tag Manager
Microsoft
Microsoft-IIS
Modernizr
MooTools
New Relic
Newfold Digital Group
Nginx
Node.js
Operating Systems
OVH
PHP
Pinterest
Plesk
Plone
PNG
PopAds
PrestaShop
Prototype
Python
Quantcast
React
Red Hat
Reverse Proxies
Ruby
RunCloud
Scala
Scientific Linux
Sectigo
Server Locations
Server-side Languages
SharePoint
Shopify
Silverlight
Site Elements
Social Widgets
SPDY
Squarespace
SSL Certificate Authorities
Symantec Group
Tag Managers
Tealium
Team.blue
Tomcat
Top Level Domains
Traffic Analysis Tools
Twitter
TYPO3
Ubuntu
Umeng
Underscore
United Internet
Unix
Unpkg
UTF-8
VBulletin
Web Hosting
Web Panels
Web Servers
WhatsApp
Windows
Wix
WooCommerce
WordPress
WordPress Jetpack
Xandr
XHTML
Yandex.Direct
Yandex.Metrica
YUI Library

Technology scores of websites

Posted by Sam Soltano on 16 December 2010 in News

Summary:

We are introducing a new rating for websites, which is based on the technologies used by the site.

The technology score rates a site based on its technologies in a range from 0 to 100.

It has three components:

  • The popularity score shows how many sites use the same technologies. This is based on the technology usage amongst the top 1 million sites.
  • The traffic score shows how much traffic other sites typically have when they use the same technologies. This is based on the top-site ranking of the technologies.
  • The version score shows how many sites use more recent technology versions.

Quality alerts also affect the rating by lowering the score by 5 points for each alert.

We can take a look at our own (W3Techs.com) technology score as an example:

  Total Popularity  Traffic Version
Technology Score 70 75 59 89
Server-side Programming Languages 70 87 45 77
Client-side Programming Languages 76 100 53  
Markup Languages 40 13 67  
Web Servers 76 84 43 100
Advertising Networks 89 90 87  

The overall score is 70, popularity is higher, except for the markup language (we use HTML Strict, which is rarely used). Our traffic score is above average with the highest value for the advertising networks, and our version score is good, primarily because we run the latest Apache version.

Now, what does that mean?

We would advise not to overemphasize the overall score. We are not suggesting that sites with a high overall technology score are "better" in any meaningful sense. Google, for instance, has a score of 51. We are not saying that our own site is technically superior to Google.

We suggest to concentrate on the sub-scores instead. It might be helpful to know whether your site is primarily made with run-of-the-mill technologies, or with more exotic technologies, and in which areas you use them. Similarly, if you have a low-traffic site, and you use technologies that are typically used by high-traffic sites, you might possibly want to reconsider your decisions if you think your choices are an overkill. Also, there is nothing wrong with using old versions of tools as long as they provide what you need, but knowing that most sites have moved to newer versions could be an input for an upgrade strategy.

In that sense, we don't want this new score to be taken too serious, but it might be fun to compare the ratings of your favorite sites.

Share this page


About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2024 Q-Success