Skip to main content

Apple’s removal of WhatsApp in China reopens debate over user freedom

A Chinese dragon appears from the Apple logo
China expands influence over U.S. technology firms. Credit: VentureBeat using Midjourney

In a move that highlights the growing tensions between the U.S. and China over technology, Apple has removed several popular messaging apps, including Meta’s WhatsApp and Threads, from its App Store in China. The decision, which Apple says was mandated by the Cyberspace Administration of China due to national security concerns, raises important questions about the control users have over their own devices.

In 2023, China accounted for a significant portion of Meta’s total revenue, amounting to approximately $13.5 billion or 10% of its overall revenue. This substantial market presence was driven by strong demand from Chinese advertisers seeking to reach consumers in foreign markets through Meta’s platforms. The removal of WhatsApp and Threads from the China App Store puts this revenue stream at risk, as it may signal further restrictions on Meta’s ability to capture advertising dollars from Chinese companies looking to expand globally.

China’s push for domestic technology

This development is part of Beijing’s ongoing efforts to replace Western-made technology with domestic alternatives, as the United States continues to tighten curbs on high-tech exports to its rival. In 2022, state-owned enterprises in China were instructed to replace office software systems with domestic products by 2027, showcasing the country’s determination to reduce its reliance on foreign technology. The recent integration of Meta’s AI assistant into WhatsApp and other apps may have further heightened China’s concerns about the influence of foreign technology companies and their advanced AI capabilities, potentially prompting a more aggressive response in the form of app bans.

The removal of these apps, which also included Signal and Telegram, further reduces the already limited options for Chinese users to communicate with people outside of the country. While WhatsApp and Threads were already blocked in China, requiring the use of virtual private networks (VPNs) to access, their presence on the App Store allowed users to download and update the apps more easily. 

The debate over user control and freedom

This incident highlights a fundamental issue with the current Apple iOS ecosystem: users still do not have full control over their devices. When you purchase a computer, it is generally accepted that you have the right to install and use software as you see fit, even if it means assuming the risks associated with using applications from unofficial sources. This principle of user control has been a cornerstone of the personal computing industry, empowering users to customize their devices to their specific needs and preferences. 

However, Apple diverged from this principle with iOS, limiting what users can do with their own devices. Apple’s iOS operating system has a closed ecosystem, with the App Store being the only official source for installing apps on iPhones and iPads. Apple argues that this approach is necessary to maintain the security and integrity of its platform, as it can closely monitor and control the apps that are available to users.

Google’s Android operating system already allows users to install apps from outside the official Google Play Store, a practice known as sideloading. Android users can enable the installation of apps from unknown sources in their device settings, which allows them to download and install apps from third-party app stores or directly from developers’ websites. However, Google does warn users about the potential risks of installing apps from unknown sources, as these apps may not have undergone the same security checks as those in the Google Play Store.

Another win for open technology

The ban on WhatsApp and Threads, coupled with China’s push for domestic control over technology, should be a wake-up call for Apple. It is time for Apple to reevaluate its approach to user control and provide customers with the option to install apps at their own risk. By doing so, they can strike a balance between maintaining platform security and empowering users to make their own decisions about the software they use. As the world becomes more reliant on smartphones for communication, work, and entertainment, and as geopolitical tensions intensify, users must have the freedom to choose which apps they want to install and use, regardless of whether they are available through official app stores.