Timeline for Should you concede to user demands that seem clearly inferior?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2018 at 13:53 | history | edited | Mayo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Mar 26, 2014 at 16:39 | comment | added | Alex Feinman | +1. Users often don't know why, and will make up lies if you press them for a reason, but they know what they don't like. | |
Mar 25, 2014 at 22:09 | comment | added | lily | +1. Just judging from your description of the change it sounds like the new UI is less efficient than the old one. | |
Mar 25, 2014 at 15:47 | history | edited | Jason A. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added summary answer as per comment from @Brilliand
|
Mar 25, 2014 at 15:39 | comment | added | Jason A. | @MattThrower Good to hear your thoughts on this. And yes I have seen hybrids search and scroll trees like you describe working very well. | |
Mar 25, 2014 at 9:14 | comment | added | Bob Tway | Although I've accepted a different answer, there's a big point here made (by a commenter above too) that there's often a third way. In this instance we could keep the whole treeview but allow filtering with the text/dropdown. That should satisfy everyone. | |
Mar 25, 2014 at 8:03 | comment | added | E. Rivera | Let's suppose that the solution IS better. What to do next if one feels forced to implement a worse, more implementation time-consuming solution? I always feel like handing the project to someone else than doing something I'm not convinced of and I'm not allowed to change. I think that the question is less about the particular case of whether the proposed solution is better, but what to do if it is but the client won't listen. | |
Mar 24, 2014 at 23:40 | comment | added | Brilliand | Excellent point, though I think it fails to directly answer the question as asked. Perhaps you could use this example to make a more general point explicitly? | |
Mar 24, 2014 at 20:45 | history | answered | Jason A. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |