Timeline for Problems with partition table on 3tb NTFS drive
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Oct 4, 2020 at 12:19 | history | suggested | user339704 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting
|
Oct 4, 2020 at 9:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 4, 2020 at 12:19 | |||||
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
Jun 14, 2015 at 12:11 | history | edited | ID-ZERO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1475 characters in body
|
Jun 14, 2015 at 2:59 | answer | added | psusi | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 14, 2015 at 2:49 | comment | added | mikeserv |
It is not mountable? So what does lsblk -f - does the kernel see any fs on it at all?
|
|
Jun 14, 2015 at 2:38 | history | edited | ID-ZERO |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 13, 2015 at 14:44 | comment | added | ID-ZERO | I was able to ddrescue a copy of the disk off to an image file on another drive with no errors reported, so I doubt it's a hardware issue. | |
Jun 13, 2015 at 8:20 | comment | added | mikeserv |
While I'm a firm believer in positive thinking, I find it interesting that there seems to be zero consideration given to the possibility that the drive itself is faulty. Have you explored that eventuality at all? Granted, it is encouraging that your partition tables were retrieved easily, but that only ensures some 4MB of the whole device is still capable of data retention. On linux I usually debug disk interface issues with smartmon , smartctl , smartd . I can say that I once had a similar drive and had given it up for lost, but it has worked since I removed it from the enclosure,
|
|
Jun 13, 2015 at 7:29 | history | asked | ID-ZERO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |