Timeline for What is the minimum wait before I may re-enter the USA after a 90 day visit on the Visa Waiver Program?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://travel.stackexchange.com/ with https://travel.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 20, 2016 at 16:50 | comment | added | Zach Lipton | @HenningMakholm I think you're on to something. The general point is that someone should not appear to be living in the United States on the VWP. Someone who makes repeated visits for long periods of time will naturally lead officials to conclude he is living in the country. Two short business visits, especially if supported by a reasonable premise and documentation, seem unlikely to be a problem. Two longer visits are a problem. I think the advice more broadly is "spend as much time out of the country as you do in it" and the "X+1 days" is a rule of thumb. | |
| Apr 20, 2016 at 9:23 | comment | added | hmakholm left over Monica | I don't think this letter supports a general "X+1 days" rule of thumb when X is not 90. For example, if someone travels to the U.S. for a 14-day business visit, then goes home for 7 days and comes back seeking entry for another 14-day visit, then I have trouble imagining that the border guards will turn him back for that reason -- especially considering that he would have been allowed to simply stay in the U.S. for the entire 5-week period instead. And even if this is a general rule, that fact is not reasonably implied simply by a single X=90 data point. | |
| Apr 20, 2016 at 6:58 | history | answered | JoErNanO♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |