Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 5, 2017 at 16:34 vote accept AndyT
Oct 23, 2017 at 15:16 comment added Tom W Please note that as I allude to in this related question, CBP does not consider trains to be land. If you are entering the United States by train you do need an ESTA. They do not mention this idiosyncrasy in their terminology anywhere on any U.S. government website that I can find.
S Feb 6, 2017 at 10:57 history bounty ended Gayot Fow
S Feb 6, 2017 at 10:57 history notice removed Gayot Fow
S Jan 30, 2017 at 11:03 history bounty started Gayot Fow
S Jan 30, 2017 at 11:03 history notice added Gayot Fow Reward existing answer
Jan 29, 2016 at 10:27 history tweeted twitter.com/StackTravel/status/693017716869963776
Jan 27, 2016 at 16:25 history edited JonathanReez
edited tags
Jan 27, 2016 at 15:17 history edited AndyT CC BY-SA 3.0
removed confusing/incorrect terminology
Jan 27, 2016 at 14:56 history edited AndyT CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Jan 27, 2016 at 14:36 history edited AndyT CC BY-SA 3.0
added 19 characters in body
Jan 27, 2016 at 14:34 answer added AndyT timeline score: 10
Jan 27, 2016 at 13:59 comment added phoog You're not a landed immigrant in Canada, are you?
Jan 27, 2016 at 13:54 comment added phoog But your flight is "3 days later." The other approach is just to get the ESTA. It only costs $14, after all.
Jan 27, 2016 at 13:41 comment added phoog ESTA allows you to board the plane, not to get into the US. You might not be able to check in without it. On the other hand, if you retain your I-94, you might be able to use that to get on the plane. Why don't you ask the US border official when you enter on foot? If he says you need ESTA, you can apply then.
Jan 27, 2016 at 13:38 review First posts
Jan 27, 2016 at 13:54
Jan 27, 2016 at 13:37 history asked AndyT CC BY-SA 3.0