Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

10
  • 1
    I’m not sure why the decision came as a surprise. Your earlier question describes a digital nomad lifestyle with few tangible ties to your latest country of residence.
    – Traveller
    Commented Jul 5 at 8:22
  • The reason is what came most as a surprise and, to a lesser extent, the decision. I consulted with a lawyer who told me that having a one-year lease agreement, especially since I prepaid six months of rent, can constitute strong ties. Also having the business in Indonesia. They didn't tick "13 there are reasonable doubts as to your intention to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa." From what I understand, that's the reason they tick when they think you don't have enough ties and thus are at risk of overstaying. That's where the confusion is coming from.
    – br88
    Commented Jul 5 at 8:37
  • ’Can constitute strong ties’ doesn’t = definitely will. Why do you particularly want to do the padel camp, and why in Spain specifically? Is padel a big thing in Indonesia? Do you play frequently/belong to a club there?
    – Traveller
    Commented Jul 5 at 9:25
  • 1
    br88 - The onus here is on you to provide enough evidence to suggest you will not overstay. If the VO believes you do not have sufficient evidence then why would they accept your application?
    – Rory Alsop
    Commented Jul 6 at 8:48
  • 1
    This question is re-opened as I could not see how the others voted, but I want to give it a second chance after the edits. The lack of the more usual rejection reason does make it different.
    – Willeke
    Commented Jul 6 at 8:48