Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 1
    You make good points (so +1 from me), except that being refused boarding isn't "voluntarily modif[ying] your travel plans." Commented May 2, 2019 at 8:33
  • 3
    But the OP was never refused entry, they were refused boarding -- these are different things. Commented May 2, 2019 at 9:15
  • 2
    OP was never processed by UK immigration (who are the only ones competent to 'refuse' entry). The airlines just declined to ferry him to UK. Indicating he has been refused entry (when there is no corresponding trail in the immigration system) just muddles the application.
    – RedBaron
    Commented May 3, 2019 at 8:08
  • 1
    I like this answer because it's the one I'd go with. If they asked me in this situation, I'd probably say something along the lines of "No, but - haha - there was a mix-up with my travel on the way here. Couldn't travel through London because of my current visa and had to switch planes! Glad to be here eventually. But no, never been refused entry." It's possible to mention something without making a big deal of it. Then you're covered both ways. If they want to know more about your visa woes, they can ask, but I expect they wouldn't care and if they ask it's probably just out of politeness.
    – user3245
    Commented May 3, 2019 at 8:08
  • 1
    My comment above assumes a human interaction though, if it's a form-filling exercise, then I'd say don't mention it, it's irrelevant.
    – user3245
    Commented May 3, 2019 at 8:09