Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 14, 2019 at 2:33 comment added phoog I forgot a preposition in my previous comment! At or by, take your pick.
Mar 13, 2019 at 22:18 comment added phoog @GerardAshton the actual rule with regard to tickets is related to the traveler's residence, not the point of origin. So a British citizen (or any VWP traveler) who resides in Mexico can use a ticket to Mexico to satisfy the requirement, even if arriving from the UK or indeed from anywhere else. This is regulated 8 CFR 217.2(c)(1).
Mar 13, 2019 at 22:07 comment added Gerard Ashton I was mixed up with the requirement to have a return or onward ticket to be admitted under VWP, and Mexico would not have counted as "onward" when arriving from the UK. But since the transit already happened, that's a moot point.
Mar 13, 2019 at 22:03 history edited phoog CC BY-SA 4.0
added 607 characters in body
Mar 13, 2019 at 22:03 comment added phoog @GerardAshton regarding "leaving to a nearby place like Mexico doesn't count as an exit": that's not how it works from a legal point of view. The person is most certainly not considered to be present in the US during his or her time in the Caribbean, Canada or Mexico. I've added a citation to the specific paragraph of the CFR. Also note the use of "may," which means that using this provision is discretionary.
Mar 13, 2019 at 21:50 comment added Gerard Ashton My recollection is if a person enters the US from a distant place like the UK, leaving to a nearby place like Mexico doesn't count as an exit, so the 90 day clock continues to tick. There is a place to send evidence that one left if it doesn't get recorded automatically, but would sending evidence of leaving Mexico 180 days after entering the US satisfy the requirement?
Mar 13, 2019 at 21:13 history answered phoog CC BY-SA 4.0