Timeline for How can a power supply (PSU) fail to power a motherboard but still test as "OK"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2019 at 20:45 | vote | accept | irrational John | ||
Jun 16, 2019 at 20:45 | answer | added | irrational John | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:17 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
Aug 31, 2013 at 5:02 | comment | added | cybernard | The 380w has 2 independant 12v channels 17A is only one of them. It has another 18A channel at 12v for a total of 35A. | |
Aug 30, 2013 at 2:08 | comment | added | irrational John | When only the CPU and one stick of DDR2 RAM are installed? I would think 28A is more than sufficient for that configuration. Also, the label on the "working one", the Antec 380w, says its 12v lines are rated at only 17A. | |
Aug 30, 2013 at 1:55 | comment | added | cybernard | It is possible to have a power supply with too many amp in the wrong place and still be higher watts. The working one has 32amp@12v and the non working one has 28amp@12v. This could be the issue. | |
Aug 30, 2013 at 1:26 | history | edited | irrational John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
point to question similar to mine that also does not seem to have an answer
|
Aug 30, 2013 at 1:14 | answer | added | Hardy | timeline score: 2 | |
Aug 30, 2013 at 0:56 | history | asked | irrational John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |