Timeline for What interesting uses for IPv6 are out there?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2019 at 16:24 | comment | added | orange_juice6000 | Isps will give you an entire /56 if you ask. If any site bans your ip just connect to it from another one of your ipv6 addresses. | |
| Nov 9, 2010 at 11:00 | history | edited | Troggy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 92 characters in body
|
| Nov 9, 2010 at 10:47 | history | edited | Troggy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 157 characters in body
|
| Oct 22, 2009 at 22:15 | history | edited | Troggy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 25, 2009 at 19:31 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by BinaryMisfit | ||
| Aug 25, 2009 at 19:26 | comment | added | Troggy | Soon, your toaster will be on the internet to grab the newest updated perfect toasting times and temperatures to toast your bagel. | |
| Aug 25, 2009 at 19:18 | comment | added | Mike M | that pretty much correct. Its similar to adding more digits to our phoen numbers because we ran out of usable numbers. it doesnt really add anything new other than the new users. There is some mobility baked into it that is different and could offer some new uses, and the header structure is more flexible, allowing for future expansion, but that doesnt really apply to you current question. The google page is more of a tidbit/easter egg than a interesting use. Its nothing new, just something they opened only to ipv6 addresses on that subdomain | |
| Aug 25, 2009 at 19:12 | history | edited | Troggy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| Aug 25, 2009 at 18:59 | comment | added | EBGreen | That is true. Regardless it is still just an address scheme. | |
| Aug 25, 2009 at 18:57 | comment | added | Grumbel | The trouble with IPv6 is that its not IPv4 compatible, so its not just a new address scheme that builds on the already existing Internet, but pretty much a completly new and separate Internet and a currently very empty one it seems. | |
| Aug 25, 2009 at 18:52 | comment | added | EBGreen | +1 - It is just a new address scheme not a newer better way to actually deliver content. | |
| Aug 25, 2009 at 18:42 | history | answered | Troggy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |