Timeline for Ffmpeg LUFS Loudnorm normalization results
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 5 at 12:28 | comment | added | JayCravens | @Clamarc No problem at all. All that time in bands is useful for something. | |
Jun 4 at 23:55 | comment | added | Clamarc | I used a compressor and the low and high volume peaks in the audio disappeared. Thak's. | |
Jun 4 at 2:32 | comment | added | JayCravens | @Clamarc Most compressors have the option to "adjust with peak values". That should take care of erratic levels. If not, the next thing would be "loudness normalization" instead of regular normalize. | |
Jun 3 at 21:27 | vote | accept | Clamarc | ||
Jun 3 at 21:26 | comment | added | Clamarc | When I normalize some audio using True Pak with a value of -0.5, parts of the normalized audio have higher volume peaks... I'll open another question about this problem and let you know if I can take a look at this problem too. | |
Jun 3 at 21:26 | comment | added | Clamarc | Thank's for your help. | |
Jun 3 at 11:12 | comment | added | JayCravens | @Clamarc Excellent! Determination wins the race! | |
Jun 2 at 22:33 | comment | added | Clamarc |
with the parameters you suggested, Output Integrated improved over -10.2 LUFS .
|
|
Jun 2 at 19:58 | comment | added | Clamarc | I did a test using a compressor on the Music1 audio and posted the results in my question. If you could analyze the values I used in the compressor, I would appreciate it. | |
May 31 at 13:19 | history | edited | JayCravens | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Better explained use of compressor
|
May 31 at 13:05 | history | answered | JayCravens | CC BY-SA 4.0 |