Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

15
  • 1
    Firmware managing to reallocate sectors sounds like an accomplishment but of course it's a simple remapping operation. With regards to BB attribute, one could argue it's bad translation, Seagate self call BB attribute BB "Reported Uncorrectables". Reported! I have seen examples of the BB attribute reporting zero while SMART logs actually showed > zero values (HDDGuru forums). 4948 reallocations and then giving a hard drive 9 out of 10 health rating is ridiculous. Commented Mar 12 at 21:35
  • @JoepvanSteen: Remapping is an accomplishment, because it means that these sectors were readable after some retries. With 4948 unreadable sectors the disk is dead. My 9 for the badness level means untrustworthy but not yet dead. Would you give it a much better "badness note"?
    – harrymc
    Commented Mar 12 at 21:47
  • No it does not mean sectors were readable after retries, most reallocations don't happen on read. Scale was 1(very bad) - 10 (flawless), this drive is nowhere near 10. Commented Mar 12 at 21:59
  • 1
    research.google/pubs/… Commented Mar 13 at 14:46
  • 2
    This discussion clearly outlines how much the subject of bad sectors is opinion-based. Furthermore any hints based on a personal use profile do not add value for future readers.
    – r2d3
    Commented Mar 17 at 0:33