Timeline for Email sent to me is addressed to [email protected]. How is this done?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2017 at 21:50 | audit | First posts | |||
| Jun 12, 2017 at 21:50 | |||||
| Jun 7, 2017 at 4:59 | audit | First posts | |||
| Jun 7, 2017 at 5:00 | |||||
| May 20, 2017 at 2:09 | comment | added | phemmer |
Actually requiring the client to send multiple messages in the case of BCC is incorrect. It is perfectly sound to send just a single message. The SMTP client can list multiple RCPT TO instructions. The only requirement is that the receiving SMTP server either be the authoritative server for both recipients, or be willing to relay for any that it is not.
|
|
| May 17, 2017 at 17:07 | audit | First posts | |||
| May 17, 2017 at 19:52 | |||||
| May 16, 2017 at 21:45 | comment | added | eckes | If you add a bcc line to a delivered mail it is not blind anymore :) | |
| May 16, 2017 at 5:44 | comment | added | phyrfox | @JonasWielicki That's a good point. I've added an edit to that effect. | |
| May 16, 2017 at 5:43 | history | edited | phyrfox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 568 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2017 at 5:24 | comment | added | Jonas Schäfer | You should note that stripping of Bcc is typically not handled by mail servers (the SMTP transcript you provided suggests otherwise, because the HELO sounds like a mail server and not a MUA). To provide a copy with Bcc header to the person addressed in that header requires extra work by the MUA by sending two separate emails. | |
| May 16, 2017 at 0:33 | history | answered | phyrfox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |