Skip to main content
Super User

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • You're linking directly to these exes and installers. Why? Would you like us to install them and see if we get it, too? I would accept links to the pages where you got them from but not the exes themselves.
    – Octopus
    Commented Sep 14, 2016 at 18:12
  • @Octopus: Srsly? IE will warn you and n00bs like you if you accidentally click the link. (If you're more advanced than that I'm sure you can find the pages in five seconds using the so-called search engine called "google.")
    – Jonas Byström
    Commented Sep 14, 2016 at 18:48
  • Jonas, chill out a bit there champ.
    – nightsurfer
    Commented Sep 14, 2016 at 19:46
  • @Kaizerwolf: Sorry, but when it started out, stackexchange used to be about asking serious questions in search of intelligent answers and there were hardly any cheesy knuckleheads about questioning the details. It was all about helping each other understand. "Why link directly to .exe's" is not helpful in the slightest. I've been here 6x longer than you and feel the original intent often gets lost these days. Does that make sense to you, or do you think I'm just a grumpy chump?
    – Jonas Byström
    Commented Sep 14, 2016 at 20:33
  • No, I think you're being a "grumpy chump". The comments are for questions and clarifications, not answers. Octopus' comment was just that; a comment, and you blew it WAY out of proportion.
    – nightsurfer
    Commented Sep 14, 2016 at 20:54