All Questions
5
questions
1
vote
2
answers
356
views
SIgnificant ANOVA but not significant post hoc ... what can I do?
I am analyzing some IHC data on the density of cells in two brain regions(factor 1) in two closely related species(factor 2). My data is composed of an n of 6 for each species and is not normally ...
4
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Which pairwise comparison tests are best to use after the Kruskal-Wallis test (Dunn, Conover-Iman or Steel-Dwass-Critchlow-Fligner test)?
I have 3 sampling sites where I took 3 water samples in each site. I chose to do the Kruskal-Wallis test to find out if there is a significant difference in total nitrogen between the sites. I did not ...
4
votes
1
answer
10k
views
Why run a post hoc wilcoxon signed rank test after Friedman test, why not just skip to Wilcoxon sign test instead?
I understand that one is required to run post hoc tests after the Friedman test. For example, while the Friedman test may find a statistically significant change amongst 3 treatments, one may follow ...
- 41
15
votes
4
answers
16k
views
How to correctly apply the Nemenyi post-hoc test after the Friedman test
I'm comparing the performance of multiple algorithms on multiple data sets. Since those performance measurements are not guaranteed to be normally distributed, I chose the Friedman Test with the ...
- 602
8
votes
1
answer
13k
views
Differences between Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner and Mann-Whitney U-test for a post-hoc pairwise analysis
If you have one control and four groups of patients with a non-normal small sample size, there are differences in these tests for a post-hoc analysis after Kruskal-Wallis?
- 81