Timeline for Is there a simpler proof than mine for this obvious proposition about correlations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2023 at 19:19 | vote | accept | Michael Hardy | ||
| Sep 17, 2023 at 13:33 | answer | added | whuber♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 17, 2023 at 1:46 | answer | added | Ben | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 16, 2023 at 21:22 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | @Zhanxiong : typo fixed | |
| Sep 16, 2023 at 21:06 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Sep 16, 2023 at 12:23 | comment | added | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | To the closevoter: This seems eminently on-topic to me! | |
| Sep 16, 2023 at 4:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 16, 2023 at 11:43 | |||||
| Sep 16, 2023 at 2:59 | comment | added | Zhanxiong | You had a typo in the first underbrace -- which should be $g(E(X)) - E(g(X))$. By the way, I think your proof is already clear and straightforward enough (as well as the underlying idea), hence further essential reduction seems unlikely. | |
| Sep 16, 2023 at 2:11 | history | asked | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |