Timeline for Percentile vs quantile vs quartile
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2018 at 2:00 | history | edited | rnso | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| Mar 16, 2018 at 1:54 | history | edited | rnso | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 32 characters in body
|
| Jun 13, 2015 at 17:18 | comment | added | Nick Cox | I don't participate in writing Wikipedia. Anyone so minded is welcome to add "octile" there. | |
| Jun 13, 2015 at 17:18 | history | edited | rnso | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 30 characters in body
|
| Jun 13, 2015 at 17:17 | comment | added | Nick Cox | Thanks for the edit. I don't think these symbols are anything like standard or even well-chosen; the collective result is just alphabet soup even though it is unlikely that many would be used together. In particular, using $P$ or $Pr$ for anything but a probability is a terrible idea. Who wants to have to remember which way round $Q$ and $Qu$ are? | |
| Jun 13, 2015 at 17:06 | comment | added | rnso | I have added it to my answer. You may also add it to wikipedia page. | |
| Jun 13, 2015 at 17:05 | history | edited | rnso | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Jun 13, 2015 at 16:50 | comment | added | Nick Cox | I've seen also reference to octiles (8). This list is the best argument for the single term quantiles that can be imagined. | |
| Jun 13, 2015 at 16:49 | history | edited | Nick Cox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jun 13, 2015 at 12:24 | history | answered | rnso | CC BY-SA 3.0 |