2374

var obj = {
    name: "Simon",
    age: "20",
    clothing: {
        style: "simple",
        hipster: false
    }
}

for(var propt in obj){
    console.log(propt + ': ' + obj[propt]);
}

How does the variable propt represent the properties of the object? It's not a built-in method or property. Why does it come up with every property in the object?

8
  • 15
    if (typeof(obj[propt]) === 'object') {/* Do it again */ }
    – noob
    Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 14:39
  • 13
    Well, really sorry for this question. I know what a loop is, I couldn't get my head around "looping through object properties", which I think is cleared now. Also, they have recommended me "JavaScript Step by Step 2nd Edition - Steve Suehring at school.
    – Rafay
    Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 14:39
  • 279
    This is a fine begginers question. I'd add that I have 15 years of professional experience with other languages and I needed this answer. I'd plus 2000 if I could. Commented Feb 1, 2013 at 13:28
  • 74
    Crazy, but I've been coming to this page every few months for years to relearn the syntax on how to do this. I don't bother to remember how to do this... I just remember that this page is always here on SO.
    – Dave
    Commented Jul 9, 2015 at 15:29
  • 20
    This is the strangest page I've seen on StackOverflow. If you read the question carefully, only one answer even begins to attempt to answer what is actually being asked, and it has a score of -6. The highest scoring answer, which was accepted, not only doesn't answer, but is simply wrong.
    – user1106925
    Commented Apr 4, 2017 at 15:31

32 Answers 32

2597

Iterating over properties requires this additional hasOwnProperty check:

for (var prop in obj) {
    if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) {
        // do stuff
    }
}

It's necessary because an object's prototype contains additional properties for the object which are technically part of the object. These additional properties are inherited from the base object class, but are still properties of obj.

hasOwnProperty simply checks to see if this is a property specific to this class, and not one inherited from the base class.


It's also possible to call hasOwnProperty through the object itself:

if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
    // do stuff
}

But this will fail if the object has an unrelated field with the same name:

var obj = { foo: 42, hasOwnProperty: 'lol' };
obj.hasOwnProperty('foo');  // TypeError: hasOwnProperty is not a function

That's why it's safer to call it through Object.prototype instead:

var obj = { foo: 42, hasOwnProperty: 'lol' };
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, 'foo');  // true
16
  • 27
    @B T According to the Mozilla documentation: "If you only want to consider properties attached to the object itself, and not its prototypes, use getOwnPropertyNames or perform a hasOwnProperty check (propertyIsEnumerable can also be used)."
    – davidmdem
    Commented Aug 6, 2013 at 19:47
  • 7
    Because, Alex S, an object's prototype contains additional properties for the object which are technically part of the object. They are inherited from the base object class, but they are still properties. hasOwnProperty simply checks to see if this is a property specific to this class, and not one inherited from the base class. A good explanation: brianflove.com/2013/09/05/javascripts-hasownproperty-method Commented Apr 28, 2014 at 20:02
  • 98
    I feel that I should mention, however, that Object.keys(obj) is now a much better solution for getting the keys of the object itself. Link to the Mozilla documentation: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/… Commented Apr 28, 2014 at 20:07
  • 4
    @Rafay I really don't understand how this answer has anything to do with the actual question. The loop does not show any inherited properties unless the OP has modified Object.prototype. This may be good advice but you yourself said I couldn't get my head around "looping through object properties". Many chose not to add a hasOwnProperty check. If you created the object yourself and you haven't added some dumb library that adds properties to Object.Prototype there's no need for such check. Commented Feb 26, 2016 at 13:24
  • 9
    One important piece of information is missing. property is a string here, should have been called propertyName. Otherwise can cause confusion for JS newbies like myself, i.e. what to do inside the if. Commented Jul 20, 2016 at 15:57
1330

As of JavaScript 1.8.5 you can use Object.keys(obj) to get an Array of properties defined on the object itself (the ones that return true for obj.hasOwnProperty(key)).

Object.keys(obj).forEach(function(key,index) {
    // key: the name of the object key
    // index: the ordinal position of the key within the object 
});

This is better (and more readable) than using a for-in loop.

Its supported on these browsers:

  • Firefox (Gecko): 4 (2.0)
  • Chrome: 5
  • Internet Explorer: 9

See the Mozilla Developer Network Object.keys()'s reference for futher information.

13
  • 8
    This is now more widely supported: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/… Commented Jan 29, 2014 at 14:00
  • 3
    And if you need support for old browsers, you can use this polyfill
    – KyleMit
    Commented May 5, 2014 at 15:55
  • 27
    In environments that support this language construct, this method allows Array.foreach to be called: Object.keys(myObject).forEach(function(key,index) { //key = the name of the object key //index = the ordinal position of the key within the object });
    – Todd Price
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 18:46
  • 4
    @AJ_83 There's no good way to break out of a forEach(). Use some() in this case, and return true to break
    – Daniel Z.
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 10:47
  • 16
    why is this more readable than for-in? for candidate in candidateStatus... seems readable to me
    – Jona
    Commented Jul 30, 2018 at 11:48
384

Girls and guys we are in 2019 and we do not have that much time for typing... So lets do this cool new fancy ECMAScript 2016:

Object.keys(obj).forEach(e => console.log(`key=${e}  value=${obj[e]}`));
8
  • 24
    How is this any different than Danny R's answer?
    – krillgar
    Commented Jan 11, 2017 at 15:37
  • 28
    It is a oneliner and uses map instead of forEach. And also the console.log satement is maybe interesting for some people.
    – Frank Roth
    Commented Jan 12, 2017 at 16:08
  • Satly, that doesn't work when obj=window.performance.memory :-/ Where as for in does. i.e. var obj = window.performance.memory; for( key in obj ) console.log( 'key=' + key + ' val=' + obj[key] ); Commented Feb 1, 2017 at 23:34
  • 2
    window.performance.memory is only supported by chrome and Object.keys(obj) returns an empty array. This has nothing to do with .map.
    – Frank Roth
    Commented Feb 2, 2017 at 9:40
  • In case anyone doesn't want to monkey around re-structuring this single-liner to do more than one thing at a time with e, I've posted this gist. It's basically just like most hash implementations, and uses ( (key) => (value) ) instead of { key => value }, but if you haven't had to deal with that before, it could help you visualize it better: gist.github.com/the-nose-knows/9f06e745a56ff20519707433e28a4fa8 Commented Apr 19, 2017 at 19:11
269

In up-to-date implementations of ES, you can use Object.entries:

for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(obj)) { }

or

Object.entries(obj).forEach(([key, value]) => ...)

If you just want to iterate over the values, then use Object.values:

for (const value of Object.values(obj)) { }

or

Object.values(obj).forEach(value => ...)
3
  • 1
    this would be the best solution (object.entries...), but I can't use it. When you want to do this multiple times and can't support it in your framework, you can use the polyfill on this page: developer.mozilla.org/nl/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…
    – Mario
    Commented Oct 4, 2017 at 8:21
  • The third suggestion is great if you only the properties' values. Awesome!
    – gnzg
    Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 16:02
  • this is best answer, you should use for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(obj)) { }
    – OzzyCzech
    Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 7:41
231

It's the for...in statement (MDN, ECMAScript spec).

You can read it as "FOR every property IN the obj object, assign each property to the PROPT variable in turn".

11
  • 1
    Thanks a lot, I understand it now. I was banging my head, going through books and Google.
    – Rafay
    Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 14:43
  • 21
    Agree with @RightSaidFred, the in operator and the for statement are not involved at all, the for-in statement represents a grammar production on its own: for ( LeftHandSideExpression in Expression ), for ( var VariableDeclarationNoIn in Expression ) Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 15:08
  • 2
    Odd this answer has so many up votes, especially since these popular comments seem to contradict it. Commented Aug 22, 2013 at 21:46
  • 10
    Why is this marked as the answer? It is quite possibly the least helpful one in this thread..
    – computrius
    Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 17:48
  • 3
    Least helpful answer? Depends what you think the OP was asking; when I first read the question it seemed like baffled bemusement about the mechanism by which a variable can be used to inspect an object's properties, and which this answer explains eloquently (the 'for-in' misnomer notwithstanding). The question "Why does it come up with every property" I see could imply the OP was looking for hasOwnProperty but doesn't know it, but I think it's more likely this was what the OP wanted to know, and has incorrectly accepted a correct answer to a different question. :-)
    – Bumpy
    Commented Sep 21, 2016 at 9:13
44

It's just a for...in loop. Check out the documentation at Mozilla.

2
  • The link is broken :(.
    – Burak
    Commented Feb 17, 2021 at 20:26
  • 2
    @Burak thanks for letting me know - fixed. In the future, feel free to suggest an edit :)
    – Matt Ball
    Commented Feb 18, 2021 at 22:03
39
if (typeof obj === 'object' && obj !== null) {
    Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => {
        console.log("\n" + key + ": " + obj[key]);
    });
}

// *** Explanation line by line ***

// Explaining the bellow line
// It checks if obj is neither null nor undefined, which means it's safe to get its keys. 
// Otherwise it will give you a "TypeError: Cannot convert undefined or null to object" if obj is null or undefined when it tries to get its keys in the next line of code.
// NOTE 1: You can use Object.hasOwnProperty() instead of Object.keys(obj).length
// NOTE 2: No need to check if obj is an array because it will work just fine.
// NOTE 3: No need to check if obj is a string because it will not pass the 'if typeof obj is Object' statement.
// NOTE 4: No need to check if Obj is undefined because it will not pass the 'if type obj is Object' statement either.
if (typeof obj === 'object' && obj !== null) {

    // Explaining the bellow line
    // Just like in the previous line, this returns an array with
    // all keys in obj (because if code execution got here, it means 
    // obj has keys.) 
    // Then just invoke built-in javascript forEach() to loop
    // over each key in returned array and calls a call back function 
    // on each array element (key), using ES6 arrow function (=>)
    // Or you can just use a normal function ((key) { blah blah }).
    Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => {

        // The bellow line prints out all keys with their 
        // respective value in obj.
        // key comes from the returned array in Object.keys(obj)
        // obj[key] returns the value of key in obj
        console.log("\n" + key + ": " + obj[key]);
    });
}
3
  • 3
    Hi, could you add more information about your answer, providing only code does not help.
    – Nicolas
    Commented Nov 12, 2019 at 20:19
  • Hi @Nicolas I've added a line by line explanation to the code. Let me know if it's still not clear Commented Nov 12, 2019 at 23:18
  • 5
    Because forEach skips empty values, I think you could get rid of the if and just do Object.keys(obj).forEach(e => console.log(`key=${e} value=${obj[e]}`)); like Frank Roth's answer. Commented Dec 18, 2019 at 16:48
31

If your environment supports ES2017 then I would recommend Object.entries:

Object.entries(obj).forEach(([key, value]) => {
  console.log(`${key} ${value}`);
});

As shown in Mozillas Object.entries() documentation:

The Object.entries() method returns an array of a given object's own enumerable property [key, value] pairs, in the same order as that provided by a for...in loop (the difference being that a for-in loop enumerates properties in the prototype chain as well).

Basically with Object.entries we can forgo the following extra step that is required with the older for...in loop:

// This step is not necessary with Object.entries
if (object.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
  // do stuff
}
26

Dominik's answer is perfect, I just prefer to do it that way, as it's cleaner to read:

for (var property in obj) {
    if (!obj.hasOwnProperty(property)) continue;

    // Do stuff...
}
3
  • Should be Object with uppercase o though, no?
    – Jonathan
    Commented Jan 7, 2020 at 14:48
  • 1
    @Jonathan Note it is the object variable in the first line.
    – shrekuu
    Commented Jan 28, 2021 at 3:37
  • I have updated the code to avoid confusion ;)
    – Cyril N.
    Commented Jan 28, 2021 at 8:28
22

The for...in loop represents each property in an object because it is just like a for loop. You defined propt in the for...in loop by doing:

    for(var propt in obj){
alert(propt + ': ' + obj[propt]);
}

A for...in loop iterates through the enumerable properties of an object. Whichever variable you define, or put in the for...in loop, changes each time it goes to the next property it iterates. The variable in the for...in loop iterates through the keys, but the value of it is the key's value. For example:

    for(var propt in obj) {
      console.log(propt);//logs name
      console.log(obj[propt]);//logs "Simon"
    }

You can see how the variable differs from the variable's value. In contrast, a for...of loop does the opposite.

I hope this helps.

0
22

jquery allows you to do this now:

$.each( obj, function( key, value ) {
  alert( key + ": " + value );
});
2
  • 2
    $.each({foo:1, length:0, bar:2}, function(k,v){console.log(k,v)}) $.each is not suitable for objects. If an object happens to have a length property and its value happens to be zero, the whole object is treated as if it were an empty array.
    – Bob Stein
    Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 12:25
  • 1
    Details why I think this is a bug-inviting approach.
    – Bob Stein
    Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 14:43
20
let obj = {"a": 3, "b": 2, "6": "a"}

Object.keys(obj).forEach((item) => {console.log("item", obj[item])})

// a
// 3
// 2
1
  • 3
    As mentioned in other comments, forEach is more appropriate here, as map is intended to return a new array with the results of calling the code block on each iteration. But we are only interested in the side affects of each iteration, not the return value, hence we don't need that new array that map gives us.
    – Danny
    Commented Nov 11, 2018 at 3:13
19

To add ES2015's usage of Reflect.ownKeys(obj) and also iterating over the properties via an iterator.

For example:

let obj = { a: 'Carrot', b: 'Potato', Car: { doors: 4 } };

can be iterated over by

// logs each key
Reflect.ownKeys(obj).forEach(key => console.log(key));

If you would like to iterate directly over the values of the keys of an object, you can define an iterator, just like JavaScipts's default iterators for strings, arrays, typed arrays, Map and Set.

JS will attempt to iterate via the default iterator property, which must be defined as Symbol.iterator.

If you want to be able to iterate over all objects you can add it as a prototype of Object:

Object.prototype[Symbol.iterator] = function*() { 
    for(p of Reflect.ownKeys(this)){ yield this[p]; }
}

This would enable you to iterate over the values of an object with a for...of loop, for example:

for(val of obj) { console.log('Value is:' + val ) }

Caution: As of writing this answer (June 2018) all other browsers, but IE, support generators and for...of iteration via Symbol.iterator

1
  • 1
    Although you are not actually answering the OP's question, this was very helpful for me, I did not know about Reflect yet.
    – Michiel
    Commented May 29, 2019 at 9:41
18

The above answers are a bit annoying because they don't explain what you do inside the for loop after you ensure it's an object: YOU DON'T ACCESS IT DIRECTLY! You are actually only delivered the KEY that you need to apply to the OBJ:

var obj = {
  a: "foo",
  b: "bar",
  c: "foobar"
};

// We need to iterate the string keys (not the objects)
for(var someKey in obj)
{
  // We check if this key exists in the obj
  if (obj.hasOwnProperty(someKey))
  {
    // someKey is only the KEY (string)! Use it to get the obj:
    var myActualPropFromObj = obj[someKey]; // Since dynamic, use [] since the key isn't literally named "someKey"

    // NOW you can treat it like an obj
    var shouldBeBar = myActualPropFromObj.b;
  }
}

This is all ECMA5 safe. Even works in the lame JS versions like Rhino ;)

2
  • shouldBeBar is undefined for all three iterations. Commented Jul 15, 2020 at 18:17
  • undefined is impossible since it's, well, clearly defined in front of you :) This deducts to 2 possibilities: (1) Are you checking for shouldBeBar OUTSIDE of the if() block? Then yes, it will be undefined (out of scope). Or (2) Did you typo the var name?
    – dylanh724
    Commented Jul 17, 2020 at 6:49
17

You can access the nested properties of the object using the for...in and forEach loop.

for...in:

for (const key in info) {
    console.log(info[key]);
}

forEach:

Object.keys(info).forEach(function(prop) {
    console.log(info[prop]);
    // cities: Array[3], continent: "North America", images: Array[3], name: "Canada"
    // "prop" is the property name
    // "data[prop]" is the property value
});
0
14

You can use Lodash. The documentation

var obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3};
_.keys(obj).forEach(function (key) {
    ...
});
4
  • 11
    Why on earth does this "answer" have 10 upvotes? It completely fails to answer the question. I'm beginning to lose faith in the intelligence on the average JS developer. Commented Sep 30, 2017 at 1:53
  • 1
    @developerbmw I understand that using ES6 features is more right way, but I've answered a year ago. Please, share your thoughts with us when you have a minute. Commented Oct 2, 2017 at 8:20
  • 1
    The idea is to focus more on native methods, instead of suggesting the user add a 10000 line library to their page. Don't get me wrong, I do like using Lodash but there's a time and a place for it and it isn't this.
    – user9016207
    Commented Jun 19, 2018 at 19:58
  • @user9016207 this answer is from 2016, and was more applicable then - esp if you were already using lodash. nowadays if you need individual fns from lodash you can get them one at a time, eg npmjs.com/package/lodash.keys Commented Sep 11, 2020 at 15:21
13
Object.keys(obj).forEach(key =>
  console.log(`key=${key} value=${obj[key]}`)
);
12

Nowadays you can convert a standard JS object into an iterable object just by adding a Symbol.iterator method. Then you can use a for of loop and acceess its values directly or even can use a spread operator on the object too. Cool. Let's see how we can make it:

var o = {a:1,b:2,c:3},
    a = [];
o[Symbol.iterator] = function*(){
                       var ok = Object.keys(this);
                            i = 0;
                       while (i < ok.length) yield this[ok[i++]];
                     };
for (var value of o) console.log(value);
// or you can even do like
a = [...o];
console.log(a);

2
  • 1
    Interesting way to do that. Thanks for the function* discovery!
    – Benj
    Commented Jan 27, 2017 at 10:22
  • Nice one, you can even use methods, if properties are objects too!
    – Dmitry
    Commented Oct 16, 2020 at 8:43
11

Your for loop is iterating over all of the properties of the object obj. propt is defined in the first line of your for loop. It is a string that is a name of a property of the obj object. In the first iteration of the loop, propt would be "name".

10

Objects in JavaScript are collections of properties and can therefore be looped in a for each statement.

You should think of obj as an key value collection.

1
  • ! with the important difference that these 'lists of properties' can have names as keys, while normal JS arrays can only have numbers as keys.
    – Qqwy
    Commented Nov 29, 2011 at 14:38
7

If running Node I'd recommend:

Object.keys(obj).forEach((key, index) => {
    console.log(key);
});
0
6

While the top-rated answer is correct, here is an alternate use case i.e if you are iterating over an object and want to create an array in the end. Use .map instead of forEach

const newObj = Object.keys(obj).map(el => {
    //ell will hold keys 
   // Getting the value of the keys should be as simple as obj[el]
})
5

I want to add to the answers above, because you might have different intentions from Javascript. A JSON object and a Javascript object are different things, and you might want to iterate through the properties of a JSON object using the solutions proposed above, and then be surprised.

Suppose that you have a JSON object like:

var example = {
    "prop1": "value1",
    "prop2": [ "value2_0", "value2_1"],
    "prop3": {
         "prop3_1": "value3_1"
    }
}

The wrong way to iterate through its 'properties':

function recursivelyIterateProperties(jsonObject) {
    for (var prop in Object.keys(example)) {
        console.log(prop);
        recursivelyIterateProperties(jsonObject[prop]);
    }
}

You might be surprised of seeing the console logging 0, 1, etc. when iterating through the properties of prop1 and prop2 and of prop3_1. Those objects are sequences, and the indexes of a sequence are properties of that object in Javascript.

A better way to recursively iterate through a JSON object properties would be to first check if that object is a sequence or not:

function recursivelyIterateProperties(jsonObject) {
    for (var prop in Object.keys(example)) {
        console.log(prop);
        if (!(typeof(jsonObject[prop]) === 'string')
            && !(jsonObject[prop] instanceof Array)) {
                recursivelyIterateProperties(jsonObject[prop]);

            }
            
     }
}
0
4

What for..in loop does is that it creates a new variable (var someVariable) and then stores each property of the given object in this new variable(someVariable) one by one. Therefore if you use block {}, you can iterate. Consider the following example.

var obj = {
     name:'raman',
     hobby:'coding',
     planet:'earth'
     };

for(var someVariable in obj) {
  //do nothing..
}

console.log(someVariable); // outputs planet
2
  • Upvoting this, given it's simplicity. In my use case I need to check all the attributes in an object for dodgy values-NaNs, nulls, undefined (they were points on a graph and these values prevented the graph from drawing). To get the value instead of the name, in the loop you would just do obj[someVariable]. Perhaps the reason it was downvoted so much is because it is not recursive. So this would not be an adequate solution if you have a highly structured object. Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 9:50
  • @KatharineOsborne or perhaps it is because the following phrase is a bit cryptic: "Therefore if you use block {}, you can iterate." The code says more than the text.
    – bvdb
    Commented Jul 2, 2019 at 9:11
4

Here I am iterating each node and creating meaningful node names. If you notice, instanceOf Array and instanceOf Object pretty much does the same thing (in my application, i am giving different logic though)

function iterate(obj,parent_node) {
    parent_node = parent_node || '';
    for (var property in obj) {
        if (obj.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
            var node = parent_node + "/" + property;
            if(obj[property] instanceof Array) {
                //console.log('array: ' + node + ":" + obj[property]);
                iterate(obj[property],node)
            } else if(obj[property] instanceof Object){
                //console.log('Object: ' + node + ":" + obj[property]);
                iterate(obj[property],node)
            }
            else {
                console.log(node + ":" + obj[property]);
            }
        }
    }
}

note - I am inspired by Ondrej Svejdar's answer. But this solution has better performance and less ambiguous

4

Also adding the recursive way:

function iterate(obj) {
    // watch for objects we've already iterated so we won't end in endless cycle
    // for cases like var foo = {}; foo.bar = foo; iterate(foo);
    var walked = [];
    var stack = [{obj: obj, stack: ''}];
    while(stack.length > 0)
    {
        var item = stack.pop();
        var obj = item.obj;
        for (var property in obj) {
            if (obj.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
                if (typeof obj[property] == "object") {
                  // check if we haven't iterated through the reference yet
                  var alreadyFound = false;
                  for(var i = 0; i < walked.length; i++)
                  {
                    if (walked[i] === obj[property])
                    {
                      alreadyFound = true;
                      break;
                    }
                  }
                  // new object reference
                  if (!alreadyFound)
                  {
                    walked.push(obj[property]);
                    stack.push({obj: obj[property], stack: item.stack + '.' + property});
                  }
                }
                else
                {
                    console.log(item.stack + '.' + property + "=" + obj[property]);
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

Usage:

iterate({ foo: "foo", bar: { foo: "foo"} }); 
1
  • 1
    @faiz - see my comments, it is safeguard against being stuck in endless loop when you recurrently walk trough object that has cyclic references Commented Feb 22, 2016 at 8:36
4

You basically want to loop through each property in the object.

JSFiddle

var Dictionary = {
  If: {
    you: {
      can: '',
      make: ''
    },
    sense: ''
  },
  of: {
    the: {
      sentence: {
        it: '',
        worked: ''
      }
    }
  }
};

function Iterate(obj) {
  for (prop in obj) {
    if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop) && isNaN(prop)) {
      console.log(prop + ': ' + obj[prop]);
      Iterate(obj[prop]);
    }
  }
}
Iterate(Dictionary);
0
1

To further refine the accepted answer it's worth noting that if you instantiate the object with a var object = Object.create(null) then object.hasOwnProperty(property) will trigger a TypeError. So to be on the safe side, you'd need to call it from the prototype like this:

for (var property in object) {
    if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, property)) {
        // do stuff
    }
}
1

Check type

You can check how propt represent object propertis by

typeof propt

to discover that it's just a string (name of property). It come up with every property in the object due the way of how for-in js "build-in" loop works.

var obj = {
    name: "Simon",
    age: "20",
    clothing: {
        style: "simple",
        hipster: false
    }
}

for(var propt in obj){
    console.log(typeof propt,  propt + ': ' + obj[propt]);
}

0

If you just want to iterate to map property values then lodash has _.mapValues

const obj = {
  a: 2,
  b: 3
}
const res = _.mapValues(obj, v => v * 2)
console.log(res)
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/lodash.min.js"></script>

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.