366

I've started using webpack2 (to be precise, v2.3.2) and after re-creating my config I keep running into an issue I can't seem to solve I get (sorry in advance for ugly dump):

ERROR in ./src/main.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
  Parsed request is a module
  using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
    Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
    aliased with mapping 'components': '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components' to '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt'
      using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
      after using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
        using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src/components/DoISuportIt)
          as directory
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
          no extension
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
          .js
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js doesn't exist
          .jsx
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx doesn't exist
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx]

package.json

{
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "main": "./src/main.js",
  "scripts": {
    "build": "webpack --progress --display-error-details"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    ...
  },
  "dependencies": {
    ...
  }
}

In terms of the browser field it's complaining about, the documentation I've been able to find on this is: package-browser-field-spec. There is also webpack documentation for it, but it seems to have it turned on by default: aliasFields: ["browser"]. I tried adding a browser field to my package.json but that didn't seem to do any good.

webpack.config.js

import path from 'path';
const source = path.resolve(__dirname, 'src');

export default {
  context: __dirname,
  entry: './src/main.js',
  output: {
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
    filename: '[name].js',
  },
  resolve: {
    alias: {
      components: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/components'),
    },
    extensions: ['.js', '.jsx'],
  },
  module: {
    rules: [
      {
        test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
        include: source,
        use: {
          loader: 'babel-loader',
          query: {
            cacheDirectory: true,
          },
        },
      },
      {
        test: /\.css$/,
        include: source,
        use: [
          { loader: 'style-loader' },
          {
            loader: 'css-loader',
            query: {
              importLoader: 1,
              localIdentName: '[path]___[name]__[local]___[hash:base64:5]',
              modules: true,
            },
          },
        ],
      },
    ],
  },
};

src/main.js

import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';

src/components/DoISuportIt/index.jsx

export default function() { ... }

For completeness, .babelrc

{
  "presets": [
    "latest",
    "react"
  ],
  "plugins": [
    "react-css-modules"
  ],
  "env": {
    "production": {
      "compact": true,
      "comments": false,
      "minified": true
    }
  },
  "sourceMaps": true
}

What am I doing wrong/missing?

4
  • 72
    I love all the "in my case" answers. Just goes to show how terrible of a tool Webpack still is. Imagine returning a single generic error for various "in my case" scenarios! Commented Sep 29, 2020 at 13:46
  • 46
    I still don't understand Webpack after years of using it
    – raphisama
    Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 0:36
  • for me, I had put resolve in modules instead of the root config Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 2:25
  • 1
    I have never seen a worst error than this. trying from last 2 hours still not able to figure out what can be cause!! Commented Jan 31 at 15:39

47 Answers 47

347

Turned out to be an issue with Webpack just not resolving an import - talk about horrible horrible error messages :(

// I Had to change:
import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';

// to (notice the missing `./`)
import DoISuportIt from './components/DoISuportIt';
8
  • 3
    Is the issue caused by npm ? Today I upgraded a module using npm, by uninstalling and installing a latest version of module, Now I got this error and the error tells to change the relative location of module, but the list of files is bit high, what caused all these files to change its relative position? Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 14:31
  • 5
    This also saved my ass. It's somewhat counter intuitive that in the sass files you can import with 'folder' but in .js files you need to do it like './folder' . Also without --display-error-details there's NO error message what so ever, it just crashes
    – CoolGoose
    Commented Dec 10, 2017 at 9:34
  • 9
    @Matthew Herbst one of the stupidest error messages:) my ass is saved, thx! Commented Feb 13, 2018 at 8:40
  • 2
    Similarly, when using Karma-webpack I had to use a ./ where I didn't expect to. ` new webpack.NormalModuleReplacementPlugin(/angulartics$/, './angulartics.mock.ts'),` Commented Aug 7, 2018 at 1:50
  • 73
    Still in almost 2022 in webpack 5 the same terrible error messages. No progress from v4 to v5 in thi way?
    – mikep
    Commented Dec 3, 2021 at 14:15
91

Just for record, because I had similiar problem, and maybe this answer will help someone: in my case I was using library which was using .js files and I didn't had such extension in webpack resolve extensions. Adding proper extension fixed problem:

module.exports = {
  // ...
  resolve: {
    extensions: ['.ts', '.js'],
  }
}
1
  • 1
    Silly me.. I forgot to add the resolver property. Thank you :)
    – Delice
    Commented Oct 8, 2022 at 23:19
39

I'm building a React server-side renderer and found this can also occur when building a separate server config from scratch. If you're seeing this error, try the following:

  1. Make sure your entry value is properly pathed relative to your context value. Mine was missing the preceeding ./ before the entry file name.
  2. Make sure you have your resolve value included. Your imports on anything in node_modules will default to looking in your context folder, otherwise.

Example:

const serverConfig = {
name: 'server',
context: path.join(__dirname, 'src'),
entry: {serverEntry: ['./server-entry.js']},
output: {
    path: path.join(__dirname, 'public'),
    filename: 'server.js',
    publicPath: 'public/',
    libraryTarget: 'commonjs2'
},
module: {
    rules: [/*...*/]
},
resolveLoader: {
    modules: [
        path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
    ]
},
resolve: {
    modules: [
        path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
    ]
}
};
29

I encountered this error in a TypeScript project. In my webpack.config.js file I was only resolving TypeScript files i.e.

resolve: {
    extensions: [".ts"],
}

However I noticed that the node_module which was causing the error:

Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration

did not have any ".ts" files (which is understandable as the module has been converted to vanilla JS. Doh!).

So to fix the issue I updated the resolve declaration to:

resolve: {
    extensions: [".ts", ".js"],
}
1
  • 2
    You can also use "..." at the end of extensions to include the defaults.
    – rxgx
    Commented Jun 1, 2022 at 21:59
20

I had the same issue, but mine was because of wrong casing in path:

// Wrong - uppercase C in /pathCoordinate/
./path/pathCoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component

// Correct - lowercase c in /pathcoordinate/
./path/pathcoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component
0
14

Add this to your package.json:

"browser": {
  "[module-name]": false   
},
3
  • i coder should read the documentation first, i always search in stackoverflow but nowadays i prefer to read documentation first. thanks for editing...
    – kimo_ouz
    Commented Oct 23, 2020 at 12:36
  • I have solved the problem with the main.js, neverthless I have the next error: Error during loading: Uncaught TypeError: fs.existsSync is not a function in localhost:9876/_karma_webpack_/vendor.js line 110252 Do you have any idea about this? Commented Jan 8, 2021 at 9:34
  • @kimo_ouz - Absolutely brilliant! Thank you for introducing me to the "browser" field world. Here are some links for other interested people: insides of the webpack-package.json relationship and NPM official notes Commented Mar 25, 2021 at 12:32
9

This also occurs when the webpack.config.js is simply missing (dockerignore 🤦‍♂️)

2
  • 1
    when running npm run build i had to modify the build script in package.json to reference the correct webpack configuration file "build": "webpack --mode production --config webpack/webpack.config.prod.js"; Commented Apr 22, 2022 at 0:22
  • 1
    I also saw this when someone accidentally had webpackconfig.js instead of webpack.config.js.
    – Phoenix
    Commented Jun 7, 2023 at 18:54
8

I changed my entry to:

entry: path.resolve(__dirname, './src/js/index.js'),

and it worked.

1
  • changed it from what? Commented Nov 23, 2023 at 13:44
8

In my case it was a package that was installed as a dependency in package.json with a relative path like this:

"dependencies": {
  // ...
  "phoenix_html": "file:../deps/phoenix_html"
},

and imported in js/app.js with import "phoenix_html"

This had worked but after an update of node, npm, etc... it failed with the above error-message.

Changing the import line to import "../../deps/phoenix_html" fixed it.

1
  • Oh no, why Webpack is so unintuitive at this, your thoughts? I also have local dependency.
    – vintprox
    Commented Jun 9, 2020 at 9:54
7

I had aliases into tsconfig.json:

{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "paths": {
      "@store/*": ["./src/store/*"]
    }
  },
}

So I solved this issue by adding aliases to webpack.config also:

module.exports = {
  //...
  resolve: {
    alias: {
      '@store': path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/store'),
    },
  },
};
6

My case was rather embarrassing: I added a typescript binding for a JS library without adding the library itself.

So if you do:

npm install --save @types/lucene

Don't forget to do:

npm install --save lucene

Kinda obvious, but I just totally forgot and that cost me quite some time.

6

I was getting the same error and I didn't want absolute imports. My normal relative import was not working with the same error and "module not found".

I was missing this in my webpack config.

resolve: {
  extensions: ['.tsx', '.ts', '.js'],
}
6

I got same problem and fixed with adding file extension.

// Old:
import RadioInput from './components/RadioInput'

// New:
import RadioInput from './components/RadioInput.vue'

Also, if you still want to use without extensions, you can add this webpack config: (Thanx for @matthew-herbst for the info)

module.exports = {
  //...
  resolve: {
    extensions: ['.js', '.json', '.wasm'], // Add your extensions here.
  },
};
1
5

In my case, it was due to a broken symlink when trying to npm link a custom angular library to consuming app. After running npm link @authoring/canvas

"@authoring/canvas": "path/to/ui-authoring-canvas/dist"

It appear everything was OK but the module still couldn't be found:

Error from npm link

When I corrected the import statement to something that the editor could find Link:

import {CirclePackComponent} from '@authoring/canvas/lib/circle-pack/circle-pack.component';

I received this which is mention in the overflow thread:

Field Browser doesn't contain a valid alias configuration

To fix this I had to:

  1. cd /usr/local/lib/node_modules/packageName
  2. cd ..
  3. rm -rf packageName
  4. In the root directory of the library, run:
a) rm -rf dist
b) npm run build
c) cd dist 
d) npm link
  1. In the consuming app, update the package.json with:
"packageName": "file:/path/to/local/node_module/packageName""
  1. In the root directory of the consuming app run npm link packageName
5

In my case, to the very end of the webpack.config.js, where I should exports the config, there was a typo: export(should be exports), which led to failure with loading webpack.config.js at all.

const path = require('path');

const config = {
    mode: 'development',
    entry: "./lib/components/Index.js",
    output: {
        path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'public'),
        filename: 'bundle.js'
    },
    module: {
        rules: [
            {
                test: /\.js$/,
                loader: 'babel-loader',
                exclude: path.resolve(__dirname, "node_modules")
            }
        ]
    }
}

// pay attention to "export!s!" here
module.exports = config;
4

For anyone building an ionic app and trying to upload it. Make sure you added at least one platform to the app. Otherwise you will get this error.

4

In my experience, this error was as a result of improper naming of aliases in Webpack. In that I had an alias named redux and webpack tried looking for the redux that comes with the redux package in my alias path.

To fix this, I had to rename the alias to something different like Redux.

3

In my case (lolz),

I was importing a local package (that I was developing, and building with rollup) via NPM/Yarn link, into another package I was developing. The imported package was a load of React components, and was configured to have a peerDependency of react and react-dom.

The consuming package was being built with Webpack and obviously wasn't correctly feeding the installed react and react-dom libraries into my local dependency as it was compiling it.

I adjusted my webpack configuration to indicate it should alias those peer dependencies to the correct dependencies in the consuming package:

/* ... */

resolve: {
  extensions: [/* make sure you have them all correct here, as per other answers */],
  alias: {
    react: path.resolve('./node_modules/react'),
    'react-dom': path.resolve('./node_modules/react-dom')
  }
},

/* ... */

Obviously you need to import path in the webpack.config.js file in order to use the methods seen above.

A more detailed explanation can be found in this article

3

In my case I had accidentally imported this package while trying to use process.env:

import * as process from 'process';

Removing it fixed the problem.

2

In my case I was using invalid templateUrl.By correcting it problem solved.

@Component({
        selector: 'app-edit-feather-object',
        templateUrl: ''
    })
2

My case was similar to @witheng's answer.

At some point, I noticed some casing error in some file names in my development environment. For example the file name was

type.ts

and I renamed it to

Type.ts

In my Mac dev environment this didn't register as a change in git so this change didn't go to source control.

In the Linux-based build machine where the filenames are case-sensitive it wasn't able to find the file with different casing.

To avoid issues like this in the future, I ran this command in the repo:

git config core.ignorecase false
5
  • Volkan, how can I get in touch with you? You website has no email on it. Want to ask a question about one of your blog posts, namely volkanpaksoy.com/archive/2018/12/19/… Commented Apr 15, 2021 at 6:17
  • 1
    @RobertBenedetto Probably easiest and most efficient way would be asking it here (or another StackExchange site if it's more relevant to your question) and post the link here. Then not only I can take a look but you'd probably get faster and better help from the entire community. Commented Apr 15, 2021 at 7:03
  • True. I'll do that. However, was just going to ask you to update it since the procedure for step 5 seems to have changed, and ask if there is any way to do step 6 using the AWS management site? I'm pretty entry level with AWS, and those two steps are very confusing. Commented Apr 15, 2021 at 8:07
  • Asked it here: stackoverflow.com/questions/67104686/… Commented Apr 15, 2021 at 8:14
  • It's been a while since I published that post and I don't really using EC2 instances at the moment. I wasn't aware of the changes. Hope somebody will be able to weigh in with the latest information. Have you also checked out the links in the resources section? If the resources in that post updated maybe you can get the latest info from them as well. Commented Apr 15, 2021 at 8:21
2

In my case,

I have mistakenly removed a library ("mini-create-react-context") from package.json. I added that back, and did yarn install and build the app and it start working properly. So please take a look at your package.json file once.

2

In my case, this error was a result of no entry point being found by webpack. If an entry point is not defined explicitly in your webpack config, the entry point is by default ./src/index.js If such a path doesn't exist you will get this error.

To change the path to the entry point, use the entry setting in your config file (https://webpack.js.org/configuration/entry-context/#root).

2

A possible reason, would be, if you have nullified a certain dependency in webpack.config.js:

resolve: {
    fallback: {
        fs: false,
        path: false,
    },
},

You also need to add to package.json:

"browser": {
    "fs": false,
    "path": false,
}, 
2

In my case this fixed it. I changed this:

import {setupModel} from './setup-model.js';

To this:

import {setupModel} from './setup-model';
2

In my case it was a docker issue. I first deleted the webpack public compiled code and when that didn't work for whatever reason docker-compose down then docker-compose up fixed the issue. I have to assume this is because I changed it from a jsx file to a tsx file and docker still remembered it as jsx.

1
  • 1
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Commented Feb 8 at 5:22
1

For everyone with Ionic: Updating to the latest @ionic/app-scripts version gave a better error message.

npm install @ionic/app-scripts@latest --save-dev

It was a wrong path for styleUrls in a component to a non-existing file. Strangely it gave no error in development.

1

In my situation, I did not have an export at the bottom of my webpack.config.js file. Simply adding

export default Config;

solved it.

1

In my case, it is due to a case-sensitivity typo in import path. For example,

Should be:

import Dashboard from './Dashboard/dashboard';

Instead of:

import Dashboard from './Dashboard/Dashboard';
1

I am using single-spa, and encountered this issue with the error

Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '/builds/**/**/src\main.single-spa.ts' in /builds/**/**'

I eventually figured out that in angular.json build options "main" was set to src\\main.single-spa.ts. Changing it to src/main.single-spa.ts fixed it.

enter image description here

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.