In ARC I'm aware that you do not call [super dealloc]
in any overrides of -dealloc
, so typically I remove observers and timers in there without doing so. However, if I were to subclass a view that I made that releases observation info in -dealloc
without calling [super dealloc]
in the subclass' implementation of the method, would the super implementation be called automatically to release the observation info handled by the superclass, or would it leak?
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
The superclass' implementation of dealloc
is automatically called (as far as I know, the compiler inserts the statement [super dealloc]
for you).
Update
Here is the reference:
Custom dealloc methods in ARC do not require a call to [super dealloc] (it actually results in a compiler error). The chaining to super is automated and enforced by the compiler. Transitioning to ARC Release Notes
-
Yes, I confirm that. It first called child's dealloc and then parent dealloc. Commented Aug 19, 2014 at 7:26