Timeline for Interpreting callgrind data
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2013 at 14:27 | answer | added | samaitra | timeline score: 40 | |
| Feb 17, 2012 at 16:00 | vote | accept | maverik | ||
| S Feb 15, 2012 at 10:38 | history | suggested | Nicolas Kaiser | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling in title
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 10:03 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 15, 2012 at 10:38 | |||||
| Feb 15, 2012 at 9:29 | answer | added | maverik | timeline score: 32 | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 7:01 | comment | added | maverik |
Yes, callgrind.out contains all the data I need (including functions missing in the graph) and most of the functions that aren't listed in the graph have relevant time/instructions spent. Don't know why KCacheGrind draws only part of it. UPD: if I choose the function I want in the list of functions (placed in the left in default KCacheGrind layout) then graph is redrawn to display this functions, but still missing others. I need the whole graph at once. Thanks in advance.
|
|
| Feb 14, 2012 at 20:49 | comment | added | Frank Osterfeld | Does the callgrind.out contain data that's missing in the graph? Also, if you sort by "self", is there relevant time/instructions left that's spent in functions not listed? I can't remember a case where relevant parts were left out. | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 15:00 | history | asked | maverik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |