Timeline for XML validation using XML Schema
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2017 at 16:54 | vote | accept | Bikash Karmokar | ||
| Nov 4, 2017 at 18:28 | history | edited | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2017 at 18:16 | history | edited | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1338 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 15:36 | history | edited | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added syggestion
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 15:27 | history | edited | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 14:55 | history | edited | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 9:36 | answer | added | Michael Kay | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 28, 2017 at 22:51 | comment | added | Bikash Karmokar | Dear Michael Kay, Sorry for my bad English. Now i have added a picture so that you can understand my question. | |
| Oct 28, 2017 at 22:50 | history | edited | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added a picture to make my question more understandable.
|
| Oct 28, 2017 at 19:27 | comment | added | Michael Kay | I'm sorry, I don't understand the question. I have problems both in understanding your path notation (a>b>c) and in understanding your English (for example "Because in this path no Entiy2 is added before"). It would help to give examples of valid and invalid XML. | |
| Oct 28, 2017 at 16:15 | history | asked | Bikash Karmokar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |