Timeline for Git workflow and rebase vs merge questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jan 5, 2020 at 20:40 | history | suggested | James Wright | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Putting the *correct* new addresses for the previously broken links
|
Jan 5, 2020 at 20:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 5, 2020 at 20:40 | |||||
S Jan 5, 2020 at 19:22 | history | suggested | James Wright | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update broken links
|
Jan 5, 2020 at 19:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jan 5, 2020 at 19:22 | |||||
May 23, 2017 at 11:55 | history | edited | URL Rewriter Bot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
May 9, 2012 at 20:09 | comment | added | VonC | @dtan what I describe here is rebasing local on top of master. You not exactly updating the local history, but rather re-applying local history on top of master in order to solve any conflict within the local branch. | |
May 9, 2012 at 19:03 | comment | added | hellatan | just to get it straight, rebasing from the master branch onto your local is basically to update any history your local may have missed that the master has knowledge of after any sort of merge? | |
Jun 22, 2011 at 23:32 | history | edited | David Underhill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor wording tweak
|
Mar 9, 2011 at 11:41 | history | edited | VonC | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
add barraponto's links
|
Mar 9, 2011 at 11:27 | comment | added | Capi Etheriel | randyfay.com/node/91 and randyfay.com/node/89 are wonderful reads. these articles made me understand what was worng with my workflow, and what an ideal workflow would be. | |
Aug 13, 2009 at 14:15 | comment | added | mhagger | For a technique that allows rebasing and sharing, see softwareswirl.blogspot.com/2009/04/… | |
May 25, 2009 at 18:40 | history | edited | Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Jan 22, 2009 at 19:06 | vote | accept | Micah | ||
Jan 19, 2009 at 15:32 | history | answered | VonC | CC BY-SA 2.5 |