Timeline for (Chez) Scheme benchmarks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2021 at 13:04 | comment | added | user2587965 | all, please take the data shown on benchmarksgame site with a lot of salt (not just a pinch). I have it on very good authority that many of those results are not true: try out the codes by yourselves to make sure. | |
| Sep 13, 2018 at 17:46 | history | edited | MWB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| Sep 12, 2018 at 19:26 | comment | added | MWB | @logc good to know. I guess one could use that to compare Racket to Chez, and the "not shootout" project to compare Racket to Java, C and SBCL. | |
| Sep 12, 2018 at 17:28 | comment | added | logc | It should be noted that the first link of this question now includes Racket benchmarks. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 15:09 | comment | added | igouy | @MaxB >>and, at the same time, let people call any external C/Asm libraries?<< There were language implementations that implemented arbitrary precision by bundling GMP, so it seemed unfair not to allow other language implementations to use GMP if they could. Level playing field. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 15:07 | history | edited | igouy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
URL update
|
| S Aug 11, 2017 at 6:34 | history | bounty ended | MWB | ||
| S Aug 11, 2017 at 6:34 | history | notice removed | MWB | ||
| Aug 11, 2017 at 6:34 | vote | accept | MWB | ||
| Aug 7, 2017 at 18:16 | answer | added | soegaard | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 7, 2017 at 1:54 | history | edited | MWB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 17:34 | comment | added | Rainer Joswig | There is a bunch of Common Lisp benchmarks. Some of them should have been ported to Scheme. This project assembles common-lisp.net/project/cl-bench some of the benchmarks. The early Lisp benchmarks were the 'Gabriel Benchmarks', here included. Those are widely translated. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 16:00 | history | edited | MWB |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 14:06 | answer | added | user448810 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 13:43 | history | edited | MWB |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 3:34 | history | edited | MWB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 156 characters in body
|
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 3:33 | history | bounty started | MWB | ||
| S Aug 4, 2017 at 3:33 | history | notice added | MWB | Canonical answer required | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 23:14 | comment | added | igouy | @MaxB Just like Racket, Python is allowed to make FFI calls to GMP; and there's a Python program that does. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 22:08 | history | edited | MWB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Aug 1, 2017 at 21:17 | comment | added | MWB | @igouy Why are you asking me? Have you specified the rules of the benchmark, before renaming this thing into a "Game"? Why would you forbid using popular idiomatic libraries like Numpy and, at the same time, let people call any external C/Asm libraries? | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 21:13 | history | edited | MWB |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 1, 2017 at 16:28 | comment | added | igouy | >>while Racket is making FFI calls to GMP<< Is Python allowed to make FFI calls to GMP? | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 0:31 | comment | added | Sylwester | So what is it ou want to test R6RS, R7RS? Have you considered just downloading the top level test, compile it in the two and run them? | |
| Jul 31, 2017 at 23:47 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 4, 2017 at 3:34 | |||||
| Jul 31, 2017 at 23:18 | history | asked | MWB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |