Timeline for Is there an opposite to display:none?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2018 at 0:07 | comment | added | tanguy_k |
If you want to override .element { display: none } (defined in CSS lib for example) with .element { display: normal !important } it won't work. You have to use .element { display: unset !important }
|
|
| Nov 23, 2015 at 21:21 | comment | added | Kevin B |
so in other words you could have used display: chunk norris; for the same effect, with a bit more kick.
|
|
| Jul 5, 2015 at 11:51 | comment | added | Ilya Streltsyn |
The value 'normal' isn't a valid value for display property, so it's just ignored and effectively works like element.style.display = '' assignment (see my answer above).
|
|
| Dec 5, 2014 at 10:16 | comment | added | Benjamin Karlog | Why is this getting downvoted? Is this a bad way to do it or? It works fine for tablerows, but should I use something else? | |
| Dec 5, 2014 at 10:01 | history | edited | JSK NS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
| Dec 5, 2014 at 8:13 | review | Low quality answers | |||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 10:01 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 8:08 | review | Late answers | |||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 8:11 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 7:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 8:01 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 7:51 | history | answered | indera | CC BY-SA 3.0 |