Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    well, you could have asked "how do you undo the effect of display:none" - then, Ilya's method would be a spot-on answer. In essence, you asked for some display: ?something?, such that that ?something? undoes the effect of display: none (that, I would call opposite). Sure, that ?something? does not exist. So no opposite. Right, no point arguing that, that is not in dispute. But you CAN undo the effect, if you use Ilya's method. So, in a higher sense, it's an opposite. It's just that there is no "one word" opposite.
    – mathheadinclouds
    Commented Feb 29, 2020 at 15:04
  • @mathheadinclouds thats what Paul's answer tell us. There is no opposite, they all are the opposite. I didn't ask for a way to undo the effect, I asked for a value that the display rule can hold like the visibility rule does.
    – Mohammad Areeb Siddiqui
    Commented Mar 7, 2020 at 21:08