Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1
  • 1
    I think you mean "converse." The inverse would be "a non-const field is not static." Which may or may not be true. The converse, "a static field is (always) const" is not true. Commented Apr 27, 2016 at 21:02