Skip to main content

Timeline for How to unstash only certain files?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

29 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 29, 2023 at 10:35 answer added Jangwoong Kim timeline score: 0
May 22, 2023 at 19:03 comment added NickDanger66 dudewad, i would be much better to never have a "pile of broken code," and what's more, never branch.
May 14, 2023 at 17:12 answer added abdella timeline score: 3
Feb 23, 2023 at 15:47 comment added A_P this is trivial in emacs magit mode, sorry command line people. It is literally 3 key presses
Dec 11, 2020 at 5:10 answer added Vy Do timeline score: 4
Jun 20, 2020 at 15:10 review Close votes
Jun 24, 2020 at 0:06
Jan 15, 2019 at 15:43 answer added Janac Meena timeline score: 15
Jun 7, 2018 at 8:31 answer added Black timeline score: 46
May 16, 2018 at 12:12 answer added LachoTomov timeline score: 18
Sep 19, 2017 at 11:18 review Close votes
Sep 23, 2017 at 0:02
May 5, 2017 at 20:12 review Close votes
May 9, 2017 at 0:00
Sep 7, 2016 at 2:15 review Close votes
Sep 11, 2016 at 0:06
Sep 7, 2016 at 1:56 comment added Jeff Puckett Possible duplicate of How would I extract a single file (or changes to a file) from a git stash?
May 23, 2016 at 3:27 comment added joeytwiddle I thought it might be possible to patch an already changed file using git show stash@{0} -- <filename> | git apply --check but it keeps saying fatal: unrecognized input
May 11, 2016 at 1:26 comment added dudewad @alex Nothing. Nothing is wrong with git stash. Keep using it.
May 11, 2016 at 1:25 comment added dudewad @AbdouTahiri Uhhhh.. git stash is a legit feature, and extremely useful. I use it daily. Say, a coworker needs me to review something but I'm in the middle of a complex change set. I'm not going to commit a pile of broken code just so I can switch branches. I'm going to stash, switch branches, review, switch back, unstash. Do you care to elaborate on who or why git stash is supposedly "not recommended"? Just because your git stash history is muddied up and hard to read doesn't mean everyone elses is. A messy git stash set is just bad workflow, not a flaw of Git.
Mar 17, 2016 at 9:39 comment added Abdou Tahiri @alex With "git stash", you can have multiple different stashed things too, but they don't queue up on each other - they are just random independent patches that you've stashed away because they were inconvenient at some point.
Mar 17, 2016 at 9:16 comment added alex @AbdouTahiri What is wrong with the stash?
Mar 17, 2016 at 9:16 history edited alex CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Mar 14, 2016 at 18:41 comment added Abdou Tahiri Just in your future development, try to avoid stashing files commit them instead, because git stash is not recommended
S Nov 17, 2015 at 19:05 history suggested jeyoor CC BY-SA 3.0
minor grammar edit, added git-stash tag
Nov 17, 2015 at 18:42 review Suggested edits
S Nov 17, 2015 at 19:05
Mar 21, 2014 at 9:44 answer added Balamurugan A timeline score: 136
Mar 7, 2013 at 16:05 answer added Mike Monkiewicz timeline score: 41
Mar 7, 2013 at 6:48 vote accept morpheus
Mar 7, 2013 at 6:44 answer added Ben Jackson timeline score: 13
Mar 7, 2013 at 6:39 answer added VonC timeline score: 691
Mar 7, 2013 at 6:30 comment added Richard I think you have to apply the whole stash, but then you can selectively re-stash.
Mar 7, 2013 at 6:26 history asked morpheus CC BY-SA 3.0