18
$\begingroup$

The hypothetical swimming pool is inside a habitat at atmospheric pressure, and on Mars at 0.38g of Earth. What are the major differences regarding water properties (viscosity, surface tension, cohesion, does it feel like gel...) and how would the swimming astronaut compare the experience to Earth.

$\endgroup$
12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean. What differences are you looking for? Buoyancy is about weight displacement, so you'd stay partially submerged into water the same as here on Earth, since the water you displace also weighs by equal measure less that you do, and you're still at same relative density to the medium you swim in. It also doesn't magically change other of its properties, like viscosity, surface tension and so on. It would feel nearly identical to here on Earth, if with slightly odder vista. Splashing might be a bit more fun tho. :) $\endgroup$
    – TildalWave
    Commented Dec 27, 2014 at 16:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Waves will move through the water at 40% of the speed they would on Earth, creating some interesting possible dynamics for bodysurfing. $\endgroup$
    – kim holder
    Commented Dec 27, 2014 at 23:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @briligg 61.5% the phase velocity on Earth for shallow waters ;) $\endgroup$
    – TildalWave
    Commented Dec 29, 2014 at 2:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am still hoping on someone summarizing the water properties in an ample answer ;) $\endgroup$
    – drandrul
    Commented Jan 2, 2015 at 18:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ that "what if"link was tweeted by elon musk today, it's the perfect answer :) $\endgroup$
    – drandrul
    Commented Jan 11, 2015 at 11:41

4 Answers 4

16
$\begingroup$

Shortly after this question was asked, it was answered (in the case of the moon, not Mars) on XKCD's what-if.

Summarizing that article, for most average people swimming would be the same, as the buoyancy effects are an order of magnitude more dominant than the gravitational effects. Extraordinarily skilled swimmers would notice small difference, but the real differences would be in activities that break the surface. For instance, humans could leap out of the water like dolphins. Jumping out of the pool would be an actual jump. And with a monofin, you could high dive onto the diving board:

High dive

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The Moon has a surface gravity of 1.6 m/s², Mars has a bit more than twice as much (3.7 m/s²). This is still only about a third of Earths gravity (9.8 m/s²). $\endgroup$
    – Philipp
    Commented Jan 24, 2015 at 18:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ buoyancy IS a gravitational effect!! "...as the buoyancy effects are an order of magnitude more dominant than the gravitational effects." $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Feb 26, 2016 at 17:29
12
$\begingroup$

TLDR

Its much harder to swim fast, even though it might be easier to swim slowly.

WHY

Your main difference will be due to a reduced hull speed of the swimmer. As noted in the comments section, the phase velocity of a wave would be reduced. This forms a hard limit on the speed that one can swim whilst displacing water.

As you swim, you generate a wave. If you swim at the speed of the wave, you will be swimming in the trough of the wave, which is basically flat. As you try to speed up, you find that you will need to swim "up hill" against the wave. This is what we call "aqua-planing" or as we boaters like to call it "planing".

At this point the equations of motion become much more complicated, but suffice to say drag increases significantly.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hull_speed for more information (note, the calculations there assume 9.81m/s^2 local gravity).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this info. Would this effect be of any significance in a swimming pool scenario? Swimming "up hill" against a wave? $\endgroup$
    – Mikey
    Commented Dec 30, 2014 at 10:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Mikey The "wave" is what we call a "bow wave" its the wave you make when you move through the water. Commonly called a "wake". So yes, the effect occurs for any movement through water, including trying to run. $\endgroup$
    – Aron
    Commented Dec 30, 2014 at 10:41
7
$\begingroup$

There's one consideration probably neglected by most answers: with water viscosity unchanged, it will be much easier to remain on/above the surface through actively "pushing against the water" - unlike on Earth, where it takes a lot of (futile) effort to remain immersed any less than what your buoyancy gives you, a couple strokes will get you sliding along the surface of water.

With strokes like front crawl you'll be easily able to bring yourself to the surface, and then only immerse your hands for propulsion, while your body skims the surface, barely creating any wake wave. Of course if you want to remain immersed or dive, it just requires you to angle your hands differently and "pull yourself under", but if you want to move fast, you can move like a speed boat, barely skimming the surface.

I guess with gravity low enough and the right technique, even running on water could be possible - not due to buoyancy but because so little force is needed to stay airborne.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Wave height will be bigger, right? And of course, droplets and splashes will take longer to fall. As your head leaves the water, surface tension will try to hold water blobs onto your face, which could also interfere with breathing. You might need to adapt your swimming style somewhat to avoid these effects, like shaking your head in a side to side motion and timing your air intake differently.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.