Timeline for Could SpaceX ever make a Heavy version of Starship Super Heavy
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8 at 2:01 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 22 at 12:38 | answer | added | Slarty | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 18 at 20:25 | answer | added | Rob | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 18 at 11:31 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | Please limit question posts to just one question! | |
| Apr 18 at 11:31 | history | edited | Rory Alsop♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 272 characters in body; edited title
|
| Apr 18 at 9:37 | comment | added | Opifex | You ask if they will create a Heavy version of a Super Heavy ship. It is not clear to me if you're asking if they will create a larger variant, or a smaller one. I would interpret it as the latter, but @Dragongeek interpreted it as the former in his answer. | |
| Apr 17 at 22:39 | comment | added | Erin Anne | KSP broadly overincentivizes horizontally mating identical booster cores. In reality I can only think of two times it's happened: Delta IV and Falcon 9. | |
| Apr 17 at 17:09 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 17 at 9:43 | answer | added | Dragongeek | timeline score: 17 | |
| Apr 17 at 9:16 | comment | added | GremlinWranger | At the moment this is likely to attract votes as opinion based, noting starship is still pretty early in development. Suggest editing to 'What performance would a super heavy variant of starship get', which can be answered with math rather than needing to know internal decision making of a very private company. | |
| Apr 17 at 9:06 | history | asked | Lawn Hollander Lawn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |