Skip to main content
Space Exploration

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ At the moment this is likely to attract votes as opinion based, noting starship is still pretty early in development. Suggest editing to 'What performance would a super heavy variant of starship get', which can be answered with math rather than needing to know internal decision making of a very private company. $\endgroup$
    – GremlinWranger
    Commented Apr 17 at 9:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ KSP broadly overincentivizes horizontally mating identical booster cores. In reality I can only think of two times it's happened: Delta IV and Falcon 9. $\endgroup$
    – Erin Anne
    Commented Apr 17 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ You ask if they will create a Heavy version of a Super Heavy ship. It is not clear to me if you're asking if they will create a larger variant, or a smaller one. I would interpret it as the latter, but @Dragongeek interpreted it as the former in his answer. $\endgroup$
    – Opifex
    Commented Apr 18 at 9:37
  • $\begingroup$ Please limit question posts to just one question! $\endgroup$
    – Rory Alsop ♦
    Commented Apr 18 at 11:31