Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 8, 2022 at 21:38 history closed Ryan C
Fred
TrySCE2AUX
David Hammen
Dan Hanson
Opinion-based
Jul 8, 2022 at 21:37 comment added Dan Hanson The problem with the question isn't that it is opinion-based, but it's far too broad. 'Astronaut' ranges from a passenger ('spam in a can') to someone sent up to repair Hubble or run a complex science experiment. There are mission specialists who require significant training, but NASA has also sent up teachers (almost) and Senators. It all depends on the role and the specific tasks to be done.
Jul 8, 2022 at 0:58 comment added JonathanReez @DavidHammen wait, what? Why is this data "CUI"? I imagine the answer to my question was worked out at least 50 years ago and would thus be long declassified.
Jul 8, 2022 at 0:48 comment added David Hammen @OrganicMarble There are no data that can be used to answer this question. The OP is asking for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) data. Leaking such data isn't quite as bad would be leaking classified information, but it can still spell fines and even perhaps years of free room and board for the leaker. (But rather substandard free room and board.) In other words, go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200.
Jul 7, 2022 at 12:42 answer added GremlinWranger timeline score: 3
S Jul 7, 2022 at 11:51 history suggested The Rocket fan
I added more tags
Jul 7, 2022 at 10:12 review Suggested edits
S Jul 7, 2022 at 11:51
Jul 7, 2022 at 9:43 comment added The Rocket fan I retraced my close vote because maybe we can possibly find out some rough numbers. It may be a bit opinion based but it can still be answered.
Jul 6, 2022 at 23:51 comment added Organic Marble I'm not the downvoter, but is there any actual data that could be used to answer this question? If not, it's opinion based. If all you are asking is, did NASA publish this number, the answer is no, because they don't know (or care) what the answer is either. They want to select people who can successfully do the job, not figure out some funky alternative means of picking the suboptimal candidates. Why would they?
Jul 6, 2022 at 22:55 comment added JonathanReez To the person close-voting: what's "opinion based" about the question? I've explicitly asked about NASA (or other space agency) estimates, not personal opinions.
Jul 6, 2022 at 22:36 review Close votes
Jul 8, 2022 at 21:38
Jul 6, 2022 at 19:07 comment added JonathanReez @GregMiller right and only a certain % of all humans could complete it successfully. The question is what % of humans that is.
Jul 6, 2022 at 19:02 comment added Greg Miller Yea, I assumed there are enough biologists, engineers, etc to be cheaply replaceable. The mission/astronaut specific training is still going to be very expensive.
Jul 6, 2022 at 18:05 history edited JonathanReez CC BY-SA 4.0
added 123 characters in body
Jul 6, 2022 at 18:04 comment added JonathanReez @GregMiller there's different parts of the training though? Some of it happens long before the mission when astronauts go to college to study engineering/biochemistry/etc - I assume this type of training is relatively cheap. Some of it happens after you're picked for the job and that part is indeed expensive.
Jul 6, 2022 at 17:55 comment added Greg Miller "A reasonable amount of training" is really the key. It costs a lot of money to train astronauts, and they don't want to waste it on someone who won't stick around, will get sick, die, go on strike, get in disputes/fights with others, etc. So I think it's a lot less of CAN they do the job, and more of WILL they do the job.
Jul 6, 2022 at 17:09 history asked JonathanReez CC BY-SA 4.0