Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ China has nothing to prove. They already asked to be part of the ISS, and ESA would be more then willing to have them (c.f. wsj.com/articles/…). Its only the U.S. vetoing that ensures that china has no part in the ISS. $\endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    Commented Jun 26, 2017 at 20:31