Timeline for Inconsistencies in the practice of SE policy on this site
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2022 at 20:32 | comment | added | peterh | Btw, I think their next "surprise" step will be something related to this. I think I know what, but I do not want to predict it on obvious reasons. | |
| Jan 23, 2022 at 13:50 | comment | added | Ng Ph | @peterh, agree with that. But my core point is that the OP should not have to do a guesswork. If it is simply a question of style, tone, or additional few precisions, the moderators that see these drawbacks in a question should be enticed (forced?) by the system to make the edits, not the converse. It's logical that those who have been selected by the system, or self-appoint themselves, to "interpret the Law", should explain, and not only to the OP, how they understand the spirit of the Law. | |
| Jan 23, 2022 at 4:57 | comment | added | peterh | Btw, Space SE is very friendly, compared to most SE sites. I think it is not so bad, even if your question is closed, you can easily formulate it to become acceptable. The first question should be reformulated to ask about the detectability of a nuclear explosion from 250 light years with our current technology (and the answer will be that it is absolutely not detectable). The second question should ask for the improvement possibilities of SETI if there are no budget restrictions (but still there are our technological limits). And the likely answer is that not much. | |
| Jan 17, 2022 at 13:01 | answer | added | Ng Ph | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 14, 2022 at 20:52 | history | edited | Ng Ph | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarify "casual visitor"
|
| Jan 13, 2022 at 9:40 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Jan 13, 2022 at 9:29 | answer | added | Rory AlsopMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 12, 2022 at 13:55 | history | asked | Ng Ph | CC BY-SA 4.0 |