Return to Answer

No, this has nothing to do with space exploration, and is just more scope creep.

Being well received and/or receiving answers doesn't make a question on topic.

Regardless, this particular question shows no research effort, so is a poor question anyway.

The accepted answer that forms the community policy no longer meets the criteria stated for acceptance (a score of no less than 5) and hasn't since the end of May. It appears the more "highly regarded" answer (which has met the original criteria, not just the lowered-bar) is being ignored on the basis it was first to reach the criteria. It may be they've not had chance to revise the accepted answer yet.

No, this has nothing to do with space exploration, and is just more scope creep.

Being well received and/or receiving answers doesn't make a question on topic.

Regardless, this particular question shows no research effort, so is a poor question anyway.

The accepted answer that forms the community policy no longer meets the criteria stated for acceptance (a score of no less than 5) and hasn't since the end of May. It appears the more "highly regarded" answer (which has met the original criteria, not just the lowered-bar) is being ignored on the basis the other answer was first to reach the criteria. It may be they've not had chance to revise the accepted answer yet.

No, this has nothing to do with space exploration, and is just more scope creep.

Being well received and/or receiving answers doesn't make a question on topic.

Regardless, this particular question shows no research effort, so is a poor question anyway.

[interestingly, this answer triggered a CAPTCHA]

The accepted answer that forms the community policy no longer meets the criteria stated for acceptance (a score of no less than 5), and the more highly regarded answer is being ignored because the moderator decided their own analysis of the community wishes was correct, on the basis it was first to reach the criteria

No, this has nothing to do with space exploration, and is just more scope creep.

Being well received and/or receiving answers doesn't make a question on topic.

Regardless, this particular question shows no research effort, so is a poor question anyway.

The accepted answer that forms the community policy no longer meets the criteria stated for acceptance (a score of no less than 5) and hasn't since the end of May. It appears the more "highly regarded" answer (which has met the original criteria, not just the lowered-bar) is being ignored on the basis it was first to reach the criteria. It may be they've not had chance to revise the accepted answer yet.

No, this has nothing to do with space exploration, and is just more scope creep.

Being well received and/or receiving answers doesn't make a question on topic.

Regardless, this particular question shows no research effort, so is a poor question anyway.

[interestingly, this answer triggered a CAPTCHA]

No, this has nothing to do with space exploration, and is just more scope creep.

Being well received and/or receiving answers doesn't make a question on topic.

Regardless, this particular question shows no research effort, so is a poor question anyway.

[interestingly, this answer triggered a CAPTCHA]

The accepted answer that forms the community policy no longer meets the criteria stated for acceptance (a score of no less than 5), and the more highly regarded answer is being ignored because the moderator decided their own analysis of the community wishes was correct, on the basis it was first to reach the criteria