Timeline for What do you do when code review is just too hard?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2016 at 5:13 | comment | added | Artelius | Your answer suggests that the 'automated proof system' reviewed L4's source code automatically. Actually it reviewed a human-written proof of L4's correctness. The proof took years to complete. Nonetheless there is a lot to learn from this endeavour about how to write correct code. (To be clear, this isn't a pen-and-paper proof but a machine-readable proof that actually 'imports' the entire source code and reasons about it. See ssrg.nicta.com.au/publications/nictaabstracts/3783.pdf) | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 16:42 | history | edited | Cort Ammon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 646 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 16:23 | history | answered | Cort Ammon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |