Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1
  • 13
    They should really spell out that you can distribute the compiled software without distributing the MIT license, and that you can distribute your own source code that uses the MIT-licensed software, with the MIT license only applying to the MIT-licensed software. i.e.The MIT license just protects the stuff it licenses, and does not make your additional work that works with that code need to be MIT-licensed too. Almost everyone who attempts to explain licenses doesn't go into those points.
    – Dronz
    Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 18:03