Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 2, 2019 at 7:36 history edited منطق متفاوت است CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 455 characters in body
Oct 1, 2019 at 23:55 comment added Nat Welcome to SE.Skeptics! It appears that you've edited your answer to note that you intend to retract it. If you'd like to remove it, you can do that with the "delete" link beneath your answer. Hopefully you choose to stick around! Writing good answers can take some practice, but it can be fun once you get the hang of it.
Oct 1, 2019 at 14:46 history edited منطق متفاوت است CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1190 characters in body
Sep 30, 2019 at 7:29 comment added منطق متفاوت است @Jordy Thanks for feedback. I do not understand point 1. (Isn't this the goal? I don't see anyone reading the army pamphlet citing this graphic). But you seem to misunderstand: 'Peterson should have used' no such number for IQ. And when talking about something different, like IQ, he should every other number but 83. That is the point with SD 13.1962: IQ scales for the same perc10 scale from real tests are like 69, 72, 81 (SD 24,16,15). 83 just does 'not correspond' to anything but the crooked number?
Sep 30, 2019 at 6:17 comment added Just J for now Greetings new contributor. This is a comment in good faith: (1.) This point is discussed in every other answer. (2.) You are saying that Peterson should have said 91 instead of 83, which is rather pedantic because his point revolves around the 10th percintile (see Bob's answer). (3.) This community is for verifying notable claims, speculating on motivation is off-topic. (3b.) "a standard deviation of 13.1962. A lucky number in front and the decimals being Petersons birth year", I am not sure what point you are trying to make.
Sep 29, 2019 at 16:05 history edited منطق متفاوت است CC BY-SA 4.0
added 463 characters in body
Sep 29, 2019 at 15:45 review First posts
Sep 30, 2019 at 9:05
Sep 29, 2019 at 15:44 history answered منطق متفاوت است CC BY-SA 4.0