Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • Not really, unless the comparison is drawn on a like for lime basis. I.e. Same condition. Do you know if that is the case?
    – Tim Galvin
    Commented Oct 5, 2016 at 9:02
  • 1
    Not really what?
    – Jamiec
    Commented Oct 5, 2016 at 9:03
  • 1
    @TimGalvin I still don't follow what your first comment meant. The number is based on the average cost of an A&E visit.
    – Jamiec
    Commented Oct 5, 2016 at 11:01
  • 1
    Jamiec has already answered the factual side of the question. So I'll answer the followup in the comments - Why? Assuming you spend the same amount of time seeing a doctor and the final treatment is the same why is one three times the price of the other? It's fairly obvious if you consider the overheads for the two. GP - A receptionist and normalish office building. Most medical equipment is low tech and cheap. A&E - A receptionist, multiple nurses per doctor, space in a hospital rather than office building, the same basic equipment plus more advanced medical equipment (some shared with the re
    – Andrew
    Commented Oct 5, 2016 at 12:11
  • 2
    @TimGalvin: The NHS document explains in considerable detail how its numbers are calculated. In particular, there is a note about "adjusting for casemix" which I didn't completely understand, but seems to be in the direction of your question. Commented Oct 5, 2016 at 12:36