Timeline for Does a -9 dB room cause hallucinations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 22, 2018 at 0:04 | history | edited | Oddthinking♦ |
Purge of the news tag. It is a deprecated meta-tag.
|
|
May 6, 2014 at 19:12 | vote | accept | gerrit | ||
S May 5, 2014 at 19:26 | history | edited | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"dB" by itself is meaningless, like "%" with no qualifier. "dB SPL" implies a reference pressure of 20 µPa
|
S May 5, 2014 at 19:26 | history | suggested | endolith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"dB" by itself is meaningless, like "%" with no qualifier. "dB SPL" implies a reference pressure of 20 µPa
|
May 5, 2014 at 19:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 5, 2014 at 19:26 | |||||
Jun 19, 2013 at 3:54 | answer | added | John Kraft | timeline score: 6 | |
S May 24, 2013 at 10:58 | history | bounty ended | Sklivvz | ||
S May 24, 2013 at 10:58 | history | notice removed | Sklivvz | ||
May 19, 2013 at 14:47 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | I found plenty of evidence of auditory hallucinations in sensory deprivation experiments, but that's not limited to just sitting in an anechoic chambers, but also being blindfolded. | |
May 18, 2013 at 0:07 | answer | added | user5582 | timeline score: 49 | |
May 17, 2013 at 22:45 | comment | added | Sklivvz | @Sancho I will give the bounty to the best answer. Let's say metastudies > multiple peer-reviewed studies > single peer-reviewed study > well referenced book citation > wikipedia > anything else. | |
May 17, 2013 at 22:42 | comment | added | user5582 | @Sklivvz, what would you accept as evidence? Would you accept a reference from a source known for its accuracy and fact-checking? | |
May 17, 2013 at 20:51 | comment | added | vartec | BTW. is there any claim of hallucinations beyond auditory ones? | |
May 17, 2013 at 20:45 | history | edited | Sklivvz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 549 characters in body; edited tags
|
S May 17, 2013 at 20:43 | history | bounty started | Sklivvz | ||
S May 17, 2013 at 20:43 | history | notice added | Sklivvz | Canonical answer required | |
Feb 15, 2013 at 15:20 | comment | added | gerrit | @Ian dB is a logarithmic scale, so the complete absence would be -∞. 0 dB is defined as the lowest sound level humans can hear. See also Wikipedia on Decibel. | |
Feb 15, 2013 at 15:19 | comment | added | Ian | I had no idea that you could have negative dB. I assumed that a vacuum would be 0, and I can't see how it could be quieter than a complete absence of vibration. | |
S Feb 15, 2013 at 14:32 | history | suggested | John C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling - hallicunations, ugh
|
Feb 15, 2013 at 13:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 15, 2013 at 14:32 | |||||
Feb 15, 2013 at 7:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSkeptic/status/302315199292129280 | ||
Feb 14, 2013 at 23:39 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 19 | |
Feb 14, 2013 at 21:24 | history | asked | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |