Timeline for Windows 10 pro as a NAT between two interfaces (to route VM traffic trough a VPN connection on the host)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2019 at 23:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 30, 2019 at 23:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 0:27 | history | edited | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2019 at 0:22 | history | edited | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 2, 2019 at 18:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 19, 2018 at 19:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 24, 2018 at 3:05 | |||||
| Nov 19, 2018 at 19:01 | history | edited | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 77 characters in body
|
| Nov 19, 2018 at 18:55 | history | edited | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 19, 2018 at 18:51 | comment | added | Ron Maupin | Right, you route between networks. You only use NAT when you must (private-to-public or overlapping network addressing). Bridging is what you do on the same network, but routing is between networks. | |
| Nov 19, 2018 at 18:48 | comment | added | init_js | Maybe I don't need NAT per-se. I would normally bridge a virtual interface (which is on the same LAN as the VMs) to a physical interface, but then I'd be bypassing the VPN interface. That pulse secure VPN interface can't be bridged to anything, and by virtue of the VPN using a /32 as its address (I wish I could change it) means I also can't place anything in its subnet and use it as a gateway. It seemed that my only option was to make the VM traffic re-enter the host's routing table. I thought of NAT as a potential solution. | |
| Nov 19, 2018 at 18:43 | history | edited | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 520 characters in body
|
| Nov 19, 2018 at 18:42 | comment | added | Ron Maupin | Why NAT, which is something you want to avoid if at all possible? This sounds like a simple case for routing. | |
| May 10, 2018 at 8:35 | answer | added | init_js | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 10, 2018 at 7:43 | history | edited | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| May 10, 2018 at 7:37 | history | asked | init_js | CC BY-SA 4.0 |