I'm using Filezilla 3.10.3 and PSFTP 0.63 (putty). Can anyone help me figure out why the throughput I get is so drastically different between the two clients? It can't just be a shortcoming of the SFTP protocol, because Filezilla (and WinSCP) is so much faster! Thanks in advance.

When using Filezilla to connect to the same server using some protocol, I get "good" throughput; ~1.2MBPS for one big file. Here's the log:

I'm using FileZilla 3.10.3 and PSFTP 0.63 (PuTTY). Can anyone help me figure out why the throughput I get is so drastically different between the two clients? It can't just be a shortcoming of the SFTP protocol, because FileZilla (and WinSCP) is so much faster! Thanks in advance.

When using FileZilla to connect to the same server using some protocol, I get "good" throughput; ~1.2MBPS for one big file. Here's the log:

I'm using Filezilla 3.10.3 and PSFTP 0.63 (putty). Can anyone help me figure out why the throughput I get is so drastically different between the two clients? It can't just be a shortcoming of the SFTP protocol, because Filezilla is so much faster! Thanks in advance.

I'm using Filezilla 3.10.3 and PSFTP 0.63 (putty). Can anyone help me figure out why the throughput I get is so drastically different between the two clients? It can't just be a shortcoming of the SFTP protocol, because Filezilla (and WinSCP) is so much faster! Thanks in advance.

I'm using Filezilla 3.10.3 and PSFTP 0.63. Can anyone help me figure out why the throughput I get is so drastically different between the two clients? It can't just be a shortcoming of the SFTP protocol, because Filezilla is so much faster! Thanks in advance.

I'm using Filezilla 3.10.3 and PSFTP 0.63 (putty). Can anyone help me figure out why the throughput I get is so drastically different between the two clients? It can't just be a shortcoming of the SFTP protocol, because Filezilla is so much faster! Thanks in advance.